※ 引述《Mississippi ()》之銘言： : 「歷史人類學」探源（一） : 主講人：戴麗娟（中研院史語所助研究員） : 時 間：2004年6月18日（週五） : 12：00--14：00 : 地 點：中研院民族所新館七樓會議室 : 歡迎參加 她的博論英文摘要供參考，在中研院圖書館網頁查到的： Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Juin 2001 Abstract: This study examines the relaitonship between French anthropology and colonialism/decolonization with a focus on the institutionalization of the former as an academic discipline between 1920 and 1960. Due to a reformist trend in colonial rule of the 1920s, the anthropological school led by Lucien Levy-Bruhl, Marcel Mauss and Paul Rivet managed to obtain state support and, especially, the support of a group of colonial elites, so as to establish itself as the official anthropology. This entailed, among other things, the establishment of institutions such as the Institut d'ethnologie, "missions", and the Muse d'ethnographie du Trocadero, in which the rules and standards of this discipline were defined. Hence these three major institutions are selected here for close analysis, in order to clarify the convergence and divergence between anthropologists and colonials in their apparently collaborated furtherance of anthropology, considered at the same time as an independent discipline of disinterested science as well as useful knowledge for more "enlightened" colonial rule. French anthropology did not complete the process of establishing itself as a universit;y discipline until the years after World War II, but attempts to rethink practical anthropology from within the discipline also began, as fieldwork in the colonies was challenged by subsequent colonial wars and African intellectuals. All this political complexity, along with generational shift in the discipline, produced a favorable environment for the advent, in the 1960s, of the "purel;y scientific" paradigm of structuralism, although this new paradigm did not actually change the anthropological practice very much as it was made possible by the colonial infrastructure. --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.231.32