作者Anonymous. (猜猜我是誰 ? ^o^)
看板HatePicket
標題[文章] 惡意賺錢
時間Fri Oct 9 19:03:19 2015
1.檢舉文章:
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 文章代碼(AID):
#1M5vERbk (Hate) [ptt.cc] [超幹] 幹你媽的論文 │
│ 文章網址:
https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/Hate/M.1444385691.A.96E.html │
│ 這一篇文章值 213 Ptt幣 │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
檢舉文章編號
72483
1010/09 likeair R: [超幹] 垃圾不要來黑特
72484
210/09 JenniferG □ [黑特] 好飽
> 72485 310/09
bravo233295 □ [超幹] 幹你媽的論文
72486
10/09 ninelai □ [夭壽] 台中
72487
10/09 xessor □ [煩耶] 我掰…
欲檢舉文章內容
作者 bravo233295 (Dr. Tsai) 看板 Hate
標題 [超幹] 幹你媽的論文
時間 Fri Oct 9 18:14:45 2015
───────────────────────────────────────
Modeling Driver's Visual Attention Allocation
While Interacting with In-Vehicle Technologies
Abstact
In 2 experiments, the authers examined how characteristic of a simulated
traffic enviroment and in-vehicle tasks impact driver performances
and visual scanning behavior.
In experiment 1, authors manipulated task- relevant information bandwidth
and task priority. In Experiment 2, the authors examined task bandwidth
and complexity, while introducing infrequent traffic hazards.
Overall, task priority had a significant impact on scanning; however,
the impact of inceasing bandwidth was varied, depending on whether
the relevant task was supported by focal( e.g., in-vehicle tasks;
increased scanning) or ambient vision( e.g., lane keeping; no increasing
in scanning).
The computational model accounted for approximately 95% of the variance
in scanning across both experiments.
keywords: visual attention, driving, models of scanning,
in-vehicle technologies, driver distraction
幹你的勒
好多喔快20頁,完全不想看顆顆
--
2.檢舉事由:
惡意賺取P幣
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 匿名天使的家
※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/HatePicket/M.1444388600.A.8AC.html