作者loed ()
看板MLB
標題Re: [情報] Nooooooooote
時間Tue Nov 9 16:35:07 2010
※ 引述《externaload (Vision of disorder)》之銘言:
: 今日11/09
: 條子: Lee的agents表示,不會這麼快跟其中一隊成交
這篇文章也說到部份的原因 :
http://goo.gl/x0iSm
Why Most Type A Free Agents Won't Sign Right Away
By Ben Nicholson-Smith [November 8, 2010 at 3:53pm CST]
Free agents can now negotiate with any team, but it would be a surprise to
see more than a few Type As sign in the next two weeks. Clubs forfeit a top
draft pick if they sign Type A free agents before the deadline for teams to
offer arbitration to departing free agents.
That means teams are probably
going to wait until after November 23rd to sign Type A free agents who aren't
guaranteed offers of arbitration. If the player's former team doesn't offer
arbitration he won't cost anything despite his Type A ranking, so the signing
team gets to keep its draft pick.
Some Type A free agents - Carl Crawford and Cliff Lee, for example - are
definitely getting offers of arbitration from their former clubs. But the
group of Type As below won't necessarily see offers of arbitration, so it
seems likely that teams will wait until after the 23rd to finalize deals.
Their patience could allow them to hold onto picks in the 2011 draft.
Grant Balfour, Frank Francisco, Jason Frasor, Vladimir Guerrero, Matt
Guerrier, Ramon Hernandez, Paul Konerko, Derrek Lee, Bengie Molina, Magglio
Ordonez, Carl Pavano, A.J. Pierzynski, Manny Ramirez, Arthur Rhodes, Takashi
Saito, Miguel Tejada and Dan Wheeler could certainly re-sign with their
former clubs in the next two weeks,
but it seems unlikely that they'll reach
deals with new teams before November 23rd.
: 天使: 天使今年季後也許會被Bora$狠噱一筆
: 他們今年有興趣的幾尾大魚都是Boras的客戶
: 包括了吹哥和Soriano,以及Jayson Werth (如果追不到尻佛
: 的替代人選)
Scott Boras Clients (Updated 11-8-10):
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/10/scott-boras-cli.html
: 費城: 將小幅調漲明年季賽票價
: 紅襪: 已經開始跟Jayson Werth的agents接觸了(Bora$$$$$)
: 國民: 據傳聞指出國民很早就端出三年的offer給蛋哥了
: 但是他想要四年以上長約故遲遲未跟球團達成協議
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.137.91.88
1F:推 mingyuh:也就是太早簽下A級妖怪會喪失選秀權,是嗎? 11/09 17:31
2F:推 mikachen:Boras的客戶真是嘆為奇觀 11/09 17:34
3F:→ ohb:太早簽下typeA 母隊當然會提arb讓你掉選秀權啊 11/09 17:46
4F:→ ohb:所以要等到母隊確定給不給arb之後再來談新約 11/09 17:46
5F:→ lgagirm:MLB的制度真的會令人眼花繚亂 11/09 17:51
6F:推 deJMH:11/23前簽 母隊一定提arb 拿新簽約球隊選秀權 11/09 18:03
7F:→ deJMH:11/23後簽 有可能碰到母隊沒給arb 就不用丟選秀權了 ?! 11/09 18:04
8F:推 Sechslee:對啊 11/09 18:13
9F:→ impose:那是部分A級球員而已 對Lee沒差 遊騎兵肯定會提arb 11/09 18:25
10F:→ lgagirm:arb是指薪資仲裁嗎?? 11/09 19:03
11F:→ ohb:樓上 是的 11/09 19:11
12F:推 jammer:對Lee來說 TEX肯定提arb,Lee也肯定拒絕 11/09 19:20
13F:推 Tulowitzki2:母隊要不提arb是幾乎不可能的吧?選秀權能撈就撈 11/09 19:22
14F:推 nicknhit:不一定啊 有時候球團不想提arb是怕球員會接受 11/09 19:42
15F:推 Sechslee:有時候提了結果球員接受就糗了 打亂球團的規畫 11/09 19:44
16F:推 Tulowitzki2:XD 跟價錢有關,但小市場球隊大概較常提前做交易 11/09 19:45
17F:→ Tulowitzki2:等到typeAorB的補償選秀,畢竟風險大很多 11/09 19:46
18F:推 HXZ:老麥的例子嗎 11/10 04:18