看了你的文章, 真的"突然"覺得出國去也沒什麼了不起. 先不要說英文錯誤百出, 這些從你過去發表的一系列文章中都可以看到了, 其實如果你自己去ptt上面看推文的話, 也很多人提醒過了. 不過大概因為你是在ptt3上po文與看板, 所以都沒看到. 這篇也差不多. 很明顯長期以來都沒什麼進步, 好像還越來越糟了. 要在國外拿學位, 用英文寫作的時候也請多花點心思改善自己的語言能力. 再者, 學術研究的重點不知道為什麼都被你窄化到一種歐美主義萬歲主義的思想上 為什麼歐美好? 因為錢多, 因為設備好, 因為思想先進, 因為學術社群大... 甚至單純到認為"go abroad"就等於是"go to the west"的荒謬預設上 你去Madagascar算不算go abroad? 問題是, 你會去嗎? 你現在參與看到的都是人家幾百年發展來的學術社群傳統, 你用在這樣發展的脈絡下產生的標準與條件來檢視與批判台灣現狀不是不可以, 問題是, 你對於台灣的現狀給了多少有建設性的貢獻? 我必須直說, 你對語言掌控的能力直接涉及到了你理解英文學術社群發展思想的深淺. 都已經唸到博士班了, 還無法判斷什麼是你可以討論的, 什麼是你沒能力討論的嗎? 請不要天真到認為拿個諾貝爾獎, 中個進士狀元, 唸個博士就什麼都懂. 這不就是很多台灣人最讓人詬病的地方嗎?? 看來你好像也不例外... ※ 引述《[email protected] (lerudit)》之銘言： : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Oh my god. : He could find out he spend 14 hours per day for doing rubbish some day... : Unless his supervisor doing all the review and ensure the direction is correct : and just leave his students doing the laboratory work as long/much as possible. : Certainly, this can make the group most productive. However, : the PhD students can still not yet know how to do proper research : after they get their degree some day. : On the other hand, : A PhD student is not expected to do research very efficiently. : In most of the situations, the supervisors won't tell the students everything. : Instead, they leave their students to find out the way by themselves. : Eventually, the students would know the answer, and how to find out the answer, : and, for the requirements of a PhD degree, to judge the correctness of the : answer. : He needs a two week holidays for thinking this. : And they won't use the same method (not reading paper at all... com'on!) : Of course, the academic circle is rather narrow, particularly in Taiwan. : However, if you go abroad, you might find out the right place. --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 編輯: rosebery 來自: 218.160.156.28 (12/11 18:54)