作者linmiou (小蝶)
看板R001210XX
標題Fw: [情報] 讀書會資訊
時間Wed Sep 19 08:15:23 2012
※ [本文轉錄自 R011210XX 看板 #1GLpW_Jh ]
作者: diony7 (七) 看板: R011210XX
標題: [情報] 讀書會資訊
時間: Mon Sep 17 22:48:28 2012
大家好，我是俐綺。應版主之命將讀書會的資訊也PO在PTT班版，
內容是與FB社團一樣的，若有問題者仍歡迎指教。
目前幾個讀書會的進度：
1.文學理論與文學研究方法讀書會
報名人數目前有十多人（含外系，但不含大學部），待柯老師回應指定篇章後就會發
mail告知大家籌備會的時間，再於會中討論出以後讀書會的時間地點。我們班有留給我
email的有蘭祺和兩隻鳥，如果還有意願想加入的（或旁聽的）請私訊留mail給我，以便
我到時寄籌備會通知。
2.漢學英文讀書會
人數目前...二人，本學期共討論七個議題（俟後），並已分配好導讀者（Ｂ：
黃阿慢；Ｅ：王劍魂），二週聚會一次，時間暫定為週二5、6節，地點暫定在博雅館四樓
的學習開放空間，若有興趣參加或是旁聽的，可以找我。
3.GRE讀書會
未免負擔太重，暫定下學期再舉行。
以上。
--
漢學英文讀書會議題：
英文漢學中的問題與爭論
Controversies and Debates in Anglophonic Sinology
9/25中國有「metaphor」嗎？
B Michelle Yeh, “Metaphor and Bi: Western and Chinese Poetics,” Comparative
Literature 39:3 (1987), pp. 237-54.
E (83dc) Pauline Yu, “Metaphor and Chinese Poetry,” Chinese Literature:
Essays, Articles, Reviews 3 (1981): 205-224.
10/09中國如何如何，誰說了算？
E Robert Bagley, review of Monumentality in Early Chinese Art and
Architecture by Wu Hung, HJAS 58:1 (1998), pp. 221-56.
B Wu Hung, “A Response to Robert Bagley’s Review of My Book,” Archives of
Asian Art 51 (1998/99), pp. 92-102.
10/23文化中國的定義問題
E Tu Wei-ming, “Cultural China: The Periphery as Center,” Daedalus: Journal
of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 120: 2 (1991).
B Paul A. Cohen, “Cultural China: Some definitional Issues,” PEW 43:3
(1993), pp. 557-63.
11/06中國中心史觀：外國學者的分寸
E Michael Gasster, “Discovering China in History: Some Comments on Paul Cohen
’s Discovering History in China,” The American Asian Review 5: 2 (1987),
pp. 121-53.
B Paul A. Cohen, “Our Proper Concerns as Historians of China: A Reply to
Michael Gasster,” The American Asian Review 6:1 (1988), pp. 1-24.
11/20徘徊在文本與脈絡之間的思想傳記
B Ying-shih Yü, “The Intellectual World of Chiao Hung Revisited: A Review
Article,” Ming Studies 25 (1988), pp. 24-66.
E Edward T. Ch’ien, “Neither Structuralism Nor Lovejoy’s History of Ideas:
A Disidentificaion with Professor Yü Ying-shih’s Review as a Dis-course,”
Ming Studies 31 (1991), pp. 42-86.
12/04懷柔遠人：望文生義抑或就事論事
B Joseph W. Esherick, “Cherishing Sources from afar,” Modern China 24:2
(1998), pp. 135-61.
E James Hevia, “Postpolemical Historiography: A Reply to James Hevia,”
Modern China 24:3 (1998), pp. 319-27. Esherick’s reply, pp. 328-32.
12/18清朝：漢化靠攏？多元典範？
B Ping-Ti Ho, “In Defense of Sinicization: a Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski's
"Reenvisioning the Qing," JAS 57:1 (Feb 1998), pp. 123-155.
E Evelyn S. Rawski, “Presidential Address: Reenvisioning the Qing: the
Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History,” JAS 55:4 (Nov 1996),
pp. 829-850.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.183.67
1F：推 r316:推認真又熱血！加油！:) 09/17 23:00
2F：推 Anglomania:謝謝阿慢～ 09/17 23:37
3F：推 SwordSpirit:好精美!! 09/18 23:52
4F：推 linmiou:好厲害～ 09/19 08:15
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: linmiou (182.235.94.235), 時間: 09/19/2012 08:15:23