: 嗯Hantuchova的確沒有打出最佳水準但是並沒有那麼差,她沒失誤時打的出來的球也是都 : 很漂亮. 所以我不覺得她是打得極差. : 至於關於數據的問題,今年法網每一場的UE都非常多,所以我是覺得認定上有一點問題. : 不可否認的Hantuchova失誤是很多,但是我覺得是沒到100多個errros那麼多. 以數據來 : 看Harkleroad全場總共拿到133分,官網上紀錄106個UE加上Harkleroad本身16個winner : 外加Hantuchova的6個雙發失誤,計算下來Harkleroad變成只有5分是forced errors, : 我個人覺得是不太可能的... : 總之我是覺得Hantuchova打的是不好但是沒有極糟糕,全場還有42個winners. : by zerkchu The problem is DH is really good in patches, when she is good Harkleroad just simply could not do anything effectively. I do think the official stats is quite accurate,look there is 106 UE and double fault is also included in this stats column, so Harkleroad has forced DH into errors not 5 times but 11 times which is not far wrong considering Harkleroad was never a forceful player as Hantuchova is. Overall this is a bad for Hantuchova, she had her chances and she dug her own hole because she loss her consistancy on her shots and then she fought back only to lose the match. The pattern of this match is DH would come out smoking and blast winners all over the court and then she would play some terrible games and then she lift herself again, this is a sign of a player who lacks confidence. DH is obviously more talented than Harleroad in almost every part of her game except probably her defensive skills. by jliang --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw) ◆ From: 61.64.102.194