囧 忘了還有一段 OVERALL Well, let's see. They are even in terms of background and intangibles. Guzman has the edge on tools, Quentin has the edge on performance. Guzman has more projectability and a higher ceiling due to his youth, but he is also riskier and less likely to actually reach his ceiling. Balance all that out and it is about as even as you can get. Which prospect comes out ahead depends on how you want to weigh each factor. If you value "higher ceiling" more than "safer pick, " you should pick Guzman. Personally, I think I would rather have Quentin. 總體評價 我們來看看。背景部份兩人平手，Guzman在技能方面稍佔優勢，Quentin在表現方面扳回一 成，但因Guzman的年紀使他擁有高極限及可看性，同時更具風險，完全長成的機會也較低 。權衡之下，兩人算是平手。若一定要分出勝負，則要看各項目的重視程度。如果你認為 「高潛能」要排在「保險選秀」前面，那麼Guzman會勝出，但我會選擇Quentin。 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.197.20