囧 忘了还有一段 OVERALL Well, let's see. They are even in terms of background and intangibles. Guzman has the edge on tools, Quentin has the edge on performance. Guzman has more projectability and a higher ceiling due to his youth, but he is also riskier and less likely to actually reach his ceiling. Balance all that out and it is about as even as you can get. Which prospect comes out ahead depends on how you want to weigh each factor. If you value "higher ceiling" more than "safer pick, " you should pick Guzman. Personally, I think I would rather have Quentin. 总体评价 我们来看看。背景部份两人平手，Guzman在技能方面稍占优势，Quentin在表现方面扳回一 成，但因Guzman的年纪使他拥有高极限及可看性，同时更具风险，完全长成的机会也较低 。权衡之下，两人算是平手。若一定要分出胜负，则要看各项目的重视程度。如果你认为 「高潜能」要排在「保险选秀」前面，那麽Guzman会胜出，但我会选择Quentin。 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.197.20