題目如下 'The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee. "We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumni who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all-female, therefore, will improve morale among students and convince alumni to keep supporting the college financially." 中文大意: 我們建議Grove College維持只收女性學生而非男性學生的世紀傳統。 雖然大多數的教職人員都偏向男女共校，說這樣可以鼓勵更多的學生申請就讀於格羅夫學 院。但是有百分之八十的學生回應說都希望保持只收女性的傳統，並且超過一半的校友也 表示他們反對男女共校。所以，如果我們繼續維持這項傳統，我們可以增進學生的道德觀 念並且可以說服我們的校友持續對本校的捐款貢獻。 我的問題: 一開始題目先說"大多數的教職人員都偏向男女共校，說這樣可以鼓勵更多的學生申請就讀於格羅夫學 院。" 而最後作者的結論是要反駁這句話，因為能夠維持女校。 那請問我們要反駁一開始的這句話嗎? 因為如果反駁了這句話，就不算是反駁作者了? 有時候題目會先給一個敘述(1) 然後作者要反駁敘述(1)而另外說了敘述(2) 如果是要反駁作者的話 應該就是要支持敘述(1)反駁敘述(2) 但如果敘述(1)也有邏輯問題的話 那我們也要列出來嗎? 最後....請問大家看的懂我在問什麼嗎 = = --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.25.115.169