题目如下 'The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee. "We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumni who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all-female, therefore, will improve morale among students and convince alumni to keep supporting the college financially." 中文大意: 我们建议Grove College维持只收女性学生而非男性学生的世纪传统。 虽然大多数的教职人员都偏向男女共校，说这样可以鼓励更多的学生申请就读於格罗夫学 院。但是有百分之八十的学生回应说都希望保持只收女性的传统，并且超过一半的校友也 表示他们反对男女共校。所以，如果我们继续维持这项传统，我们可以增进学生的道德观 念并且可以说服我们的校友持续对本校的捐款贡献。 我的问题: 一开始题目先说"大多数的教职人员都偏向男女共校，说这样可以鼓励更多的学生申请就读於格罗夫学 院。" 而最後作者的结论是要反驳这句话，因为能够维持女校。 那请问我们要反驳一开始的这句话吗? 因为如果反驳了这句话，就不算是反驳作者了? 有时候题目会先给一个叙述(1) 然後作者要反驳叙述(1)而另外说了叙述(2) 如果是要反驳作者的话 应该就是要支持叙述(1)反驳叙述(2) 但如果叙述(1)也有逻辑问题的话 那我们也要列出来吗? 最後....请问大家看的懂我在问什麽吗 = = --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.25.115.169