: At 5:2 Hantuchova played well she hit 3 clean winners pass Harleroad, : Hantuchova was the one who is dictating the play, it is either she make : winner or missed the line completely. 嗯不過那時很明顯可以看的出來Harkleroad章法都打亂了. 讓Hantuchova重新把穩定性 找回來. : Harleroad is more of defensive player in the mode of Clijsters, she is not : a shotmaker as Hantuchova is, when on song Hantuchova is simply beautiful to : watch. By her own standard Hantuchova did play badly, she simply did not have : any consistancy in her game to win the match but she was close. 101 errors : in a 3 hours and 3 sets match is not acceptable by any standard, think this : way 101 errors equals 2.65 points in every game to your opponent,so you always : start at 0:30 on your service game and 30:0 on your opponets service game. : So there is no question Hantuchova played a bad match. A bad match is not : indicated by the closeness of the result but what a player did over the : length of thematch. : by jliang 嗯Hantuchova的確沒有打出最佳水準但是並沒有那麼差,她沒失誤時打的出來的球也是都 很漂亮. 所以我不覺得她是打得極差. 至於關於數據的問題,今年法網每一場的UE都非常多,所以我是覺得認定上有一點問題. 不可否認的Hantuchova失誤是很多,但是我覺得是沒到100多個errros那麼多. 以數據來 看Harkleroad全場總共拿到133分,官網上紀錄106個UE加上Harkleroad本身16個winner 外加Hantuchova的6個雙發失誤,計算下來Harkleroad變成只有5分是forced errors, 我個人覺得是不太可能的... 總之我是覺得Hantuchova打的是不好但是沒有極糟糕,全場還有42個winners. by zerkchu --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw) ◆ From: 61.64.102.194 ※ 編輯: establish 來自: 61.64.102.194 (05/29 14:10)