: At 5:2 Hantuchova played well she hit 3 clean winners pass Harleroad, : Hantuchova was the one who is dictating the play, it is either she make : winner or missed the line completely. 嗯不过那时很明显可以看的出来Harkleroad章法都打乱了. 让Hantuchova重新把稳定性 找回来. : Harleroad is more of defensive player in the mode of Clijsters, she is not : a shotmaker as Hantuchova is, when on song Hantuchova is simply beautiful to : watch. By her own standard Hantuchova did play badly, she simply did not have : any consistancy in her game to win the match but she was close. 101 errors : in a 3 hours and 3 sets match is not acceptable by any standard, think this : way 101 errors equals 2.65 points in every game to your opponent,so you always : start at 0:30 on your service game and 30:0 on your opponets service game. : So there is no question Hantuchova played a bad match. A bad match is not : indicated by the closeness of the result but what a player did over the : length of thematch. : by jliang 嗯Hantuchova的确没有打出最佳水准但是并没有那麽差,她没失误时打的出来的球也是都 很漂亮. 所以我不觉得她是打得极差. 至於关於数据的问题,今年法网每一场的UE都非常多,所以我是觉得认定上有一点问题. 不可否认的Hantuchova失误是很多,但是我觉得是没到100多个errros那麽多. 以数据来 看Harkleroad全场总共拿到133分,官网上纪录106个UE加上Harkleroad本身16个winner 外加Hantuchova的6个双发失误,计算下来Harkleroad变成只有5分是forced errors, 我个人觉得是不太可能的... 总之我是觉得Hantuchova打的是不好但是没有极糟糕,全场还有42个winners. by zerkchu --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw) ◆ From: 61.64.102.194 ※ 编辑: establish 来自: 61.64.102.194 (05/29 14:10)