作者establish (Est)
看板Tennis
标题Re: [转录]第11颗种子掉落--9 韩娃
时间Thu May 29 14:09:52 2003
: At 5:2 Hantuchova played well she hit 3 clean winners pass Harleroad,
: Hantuchova was the one who is dictating the play, it is either she make
: winner or missed the line completely.
嗯不过那时很明显可以看的出来Harkleroad章法都打乱了. 让Hantuchova重新把稳定性
找回来.
: Harleroad is more of defensive player in the mode of Clijsters, she is not
: a shotmaker as Hantuchova is, when on song Hantuchova is simply beautiful to
: watch. By her own standard Hantuchova did play badly, she simply did not have
: any consistancy in her game to win the match but she was close. 101 errors
: in a 3 hours and 3 sets match is not acceptable by any standard, think this
: way 101 errors equals 2.65 points in every game to your opponent,so you always
: start at 0:30 on your service game and 30:0 on your opponets service game.
: So there is no question Hantuchova played a bad match. A bad match is not
: indicated by the closeness of the result but what a player did over the
: length of thematch.
: by jliang
嗯Hantuchova的确没有打出最佳水准但是并没有那麽差,她没失误时打的出来的球也是都
很漂亮. 所以我不觉得她是打得极差.
至於关於数据的问题,今年法网每一场的UE都非常多,所以我是觉得认定上有一点问题.
不可否认的Hantuchova失误是很多,但是我觉得是没到100多个errros那麽多. 以数据来
看Harkleroad全场总共拿到133分,官网上纪录106个UE加上Harkleroad本身16个winner
外加Hantuchova的6个双发失误,计算下来Harkleroad变成只有5分是forced errors,
我个人觉得是不太可能的...
总之我是觉得Hantuchova打的是不好但是没有极糟糕,全场还有42个winners.
by zerkchu
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 61.64.102.194
※ 编辑: establish 来自: 61.64.102.194 (05/29 14:10)
1F:→ Seles:777元! 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
2F:→ zerkchu:嗯不过这篇真的是写的有错误,所以被反驳哈 推 203.219.101.22 05/29
3F:→ establish:我觉得良性的讨论,不过说对或说错都是好 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
4F:→ establish:文:p 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
5F:→ chairman:前几轮UE多很正常吧:) 推140.112.120.213 05/29
6F:→ establish:主要讨论其实是互动的…:) 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
7F:→ zerkchu:嗯不过今年的确很多场比赛失误都太多了,让 推 203.219.101.22 05/29
8F:→ zerkchu:人怀疑... 推 203.219.101.22 05/29