作者CasterBailey (凱特貝莉)
看板Translation
標題[英中] 跟質性研究有關的一句英文
時間Fri Oct 28 15:43:15 2011
It is not the world which is the material of the narrative;
rather,it is the narrative from which the world is abstracted.
我猜意思應該是：
世界並不是敘述的材料；倒不如說，敘述是從這個世界中抽取出來的。
（rather的感覺好難翻的貼切...orz）
我是不是哪裡翻不對...因為我好像沒有很懂這句話想表達什麼？ ＠＿＠
還是因為我的質性分析基礎不好...所以沒有了解到這句話的精髓呢？
板上高手好多，還請大家多多指教，非常謝謝！ :'(
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 115.30.68.15
1F：→ chingfen:有前後文嗎？it是虛主詞，還是某種事物的代名詞？ 10/28 16:36
2F：→ CasterBailey:我猜應該是虛主詞~因為這是一句沒頭沒尾的引用...= = 10/28 17:15
那來補個原文好了： @@"
This book is about how people talk and the discursive resources they avail
themselves of. I am interested in how they narrate their illness, themselves
in their illness, their lives and those close to them. I assume that
all those experiences are predominantly discursive.
Following Bauman
(1986), it is not the world which is the material of the narrative; rather,
it is the narrative from which the world is abstracted. In what follows, I
am going to offer a brief account of a model of discourse analysis with
which I have sympathy (for a much more comprehensive discussion, see
Barker and Galasi ′ nski, 2001). The review I offer here is based upon the
earlier one, although some accents have changed.
我覺得我可能是真的對這個領域不熟悉吧.... QQ
※ 編輯: CasterBailey 來自: 115.30.68.15 (10/28 17:35)
3F：推 l10nel:有還不早給！這樣一看便知it不指任何東西 10/28 17:48
4F：→ CasterBailey:噢~本來想說原文裡就已經是引用所以就沒有附了～ >< 10/28 17:51
5F：推 l10nel:雖說如此，引用者前面的話給引用句提供語境，何況不是直接 10/28 18:00
6F：→ l10nel:引用，那關係更密切了 10/28 18:01
7F：→ usread:不需要前後文就知道it是虛指.問題在第二句你讀錯了. 10/28 18:16
8F：推 spacedunce5:相反地，世界才是從敘述萃取而得。 10/28 20:10
9F：→ spacedunce5:其實我覺得這語境用複數更好 10/28 20:10
10F：推 pentimento:前後兩句都是強調句句型: it is ... that .... 10/29 00:27