※ 引述《whydan (真是抱歉啊(′‧ω‧‵))》之铭言： 还误导勒，原文连结都贴上了，自己点进去用google机翻都一样的话 再强调一次，Dr.Toole什麽时候支持X-curve跟全频EQ了，谁才在误导，摆明着胡扯 ※ 编辑: whydan (42.77.248.26 台湾), 05/04/2025 01:40:59 您书有没有读通,我是真的不知道,最底下这段是Toole,..2018). Sound reproduction: The acoustics and psychoacoustics of loudspeakers and rooms (3rd.). Routledge., secion 12.2.3的其中一段文字 甚至阅读ptt文章的理解力也很特殊, 我的原文也只说500Hz以上,是可以做小幅修正的, 甚至我一开始就说toole并不支持全频EQ 也只有写到Dolby Atmos Music Curve不是X-curve 您自己再强调一次之前,请好好看懂别人写的东西好吗?然後就说别人胡扯,真是毫无建设性的东西,我就懒得再回覆了 =========== In summary, at frequencies above the transition region, a room curve that is close to that shown in Figure 12.4d can offer reassurance that excellent loudspeakers have been purchased. This fact would have been easily recognized if complete anechoic data had been available on the loudspeakers. If the measured curve significantly deviates from the target curve, there is no certainty that equalizing the system to better match the target will improve the sound quality. If the loudspeakers have relatively constant or smoothly changing directivity, and the problem is a poor frequency response, there is a chance of improvement. As shown in Figure 4.12, above the transition frequency the most reliable basis for equalization is anechoic data on the loudspeakers. 总结而言，在超过转换区域（transition region）的频率范围内，若房间量测曲线与图 12.4d 所示的目标曲线接近，这可作为已选购优良扬声器的一项佐证。若当时能取得该扬 声器的完整无响室资料，这一点将更为明确。 然而，若量测曲线与目标曲线有显着偏离，将系统等化以更贴近目标曲线，并无法保证能 改善音质。 若该扬声器具备相对稳定或平滑变化的指向性（directivity），且问题出在频率回应不 佳，则透过等化进行改善仍有一定可能性。如图 4.12 所示，在超过转换频率的范围中， 最可靠的等化依据是来自扬声器的无响室量测资料。 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 114.37.226.48 (台湾) ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Audiophile/M.1746319236.A.9F0.html