作者penghudust (秋尘)
看板B98A013XX
标题[闲聊] 某法学组网管说我们版面很不充实 充实他一下!
时间Mon Oct 19 21:07:09 2009
总之，为了充实版面以後我想尽量每天贴一篇有趣又简短的英文案例
下面会附法律相关单字典,还有中文的大意
（PS单字翻译部分只是依我理解的翻译，有错尽量纠正）
希望我们四年後英文可以保持！！
...
挖嘞!??! ppt不能剪贴?!? 那我不就要手打 = 口 =!?
这样看来不能每天ＰＯ了 = ="
Anyways...以下：
A Drain on the Legal System
A North Carolina women Has sued the city of Raleigh and Lake county demanding
that they either drain her lake or buy it back from her.
Kristine Wallace, on her first real estate investment venture, purchased
eight acres of land for 12,500 (USD) last year at a public auction of
property with delinquent taxes. The "as is" sale is for land that is at
the bottom of a lake, something that is not in dispute.
Miss Wallace now is suing to have both the water and the wooden footbridge
(which conveyed with the property as part of an easement) removed, alleging
that the city is "trespassing" on the land by allowing residents to use the
footbridge for jogging and cycling. The lawsuit further claims that the
country is acting "malicious" by keeping the land flooded; another easement
that conveyed with the property stated that it was a flood-control lake.
All parties acknowledge that this is a case of first impression.
基本大意:
就是有一个女人买了一片防洪用的土地,那土地长期淹水,政府有盖桥
提供附近居民慢跑、其车休闲。（桥是地役权一部分，作为防洪用地也是）
女人告了州政府，要求拆掉桥并且把水吸乾。
法律相关单字：
Delinquent taxes 到期未付的税
Allege 宣称
Trespassing 在此做为侵犯、侵占
Malicious (intent) 恶意的
Easement 地役权
Convey 转让
Case of first impression: a case in which a question of interpretation
of law is presented which has never arisen in any reported case
（中文应该可以叫做法律／案例先趋吧）
我的妈阿！ ＝ ＝ 打字打了半个钟头
如果没人想看我以後就不ＰＯ了 ＞ ＜
-秋尘
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.239.59
1F：推 ROCSimonLiu:我直接end了XD 心理上支持你!!!!!!! 10/19 21:09
2F：推 gp6cji3:秋尘同学你也太强了吧XDD" 10/19 21:23
3F：推 Oranger1316:我记得 Alt+P 是贴上吧XD 10/19 21:31
4F：→ n51222002:友情推 秋尘好秋！ 10/19 21:46
5F：推 superdejavu:挖@@ 10/19 21:54
6F：推 gp6cji3:话说应该用滑鼠右键点贴上就可以了~ 10/19 22:11
7F：推 ohfanel666:推"秋尘好秋"<-有笑到&大推认真的秋尘<-还说不想拼卷 10/19 22:15
8F：→ ohfanel666:drain 排水venture 投机行为auction 拍卖dispute 争议 10/19 22:16
9F：→ ohfanel666:lawsuit 诉讼 interpretation 诠释 10/19 22:17
10F：→ penghudust:傻眼><" Alt+p?!右键贴上!? (晕~ 10/19 22:19
11F：推 Bazodee:一哥不愧是一哥~太厉害了 10/19 22:25
12F：→ penghudust:回楼上~我讨厌重复看资料(复习),别说书卷,有过我就笑了 10/19 22:25
13F：推 emperorK:我会努力看完!你也太... 10/19 22:47
14F：推 tfoasy:辛苦了 有看有推 10/19 22:52
15F：→ tfoasy:板主快m吧!!! 10/19 22:53
16F：推 Eltanin:这一篇文章值 375 元 10/19 23:01
17F：推 linarina:秋尘好秋"<-有笑到&大推认真的秋尘<-还说不想拼卷 10/19 23:21
18F：推 milkyamy:澎湖大哥你实在实在太伟大了，大推大推 10/19 23:24
19F：推 meng101:这就是差距~推~ 10/20 00:07
20F：推 taiton03:那我可以请教那个法学同学何谓充实吗? 10/20 00:28
21F：推 taiton03:所以没有网宣充斥版面这样就叫不充实罗 10/20 00:31
22F：推 ROCSimonLiu:楼上自己想得不够多不够深就不要自曝其短 10/20 00:52
23F：推 taiton03:根据批判性好课的sop，你首先要定义"多" 和"深" 10/20 00:54
24F：→ taiton03:再来检讨"曝"，这个行为是应然还是实然 10/20 00:55
25F：推 ROCSimonLiu: 露 10/20 00:55
26F：推 ROCSimonLiu:你就用多学了一年的法学绪论吓人 10/20 01:21
27F：→ ROCSimonLiu:你这样好吗？ 10/20 01:22
28F：→ ROCSimonLiu:让你很爽吗？ 10/20 01:22
29F：→ ROCSimonLiu:不说了^^掰掰 10/20 01:22
30F：推 taiton03:楼上ㄉㄉ 安安泥好 几岁住哪? 10/20 01:23
31F：推 andrewmai:秋尘好棒 10/20 13:57
32F：推 jen150321:这也太认真了吧? 其实充不充实是用大家宅的程度决定的.. 10/20 16:42
33F：推 Oranger1316:哈哈开心就好嘛 管谁说什麽 10/20 19:07
34F：→ penghudust:冷静阿ˊˋ 10/20 22:25
35F：推 gp6cji3:calm down please~~~就开开玩笑，开心就好啦!! 10/20 23:16
36F：推 tseng90132:哇 大哥好棒耶 超崇拜你的拉 XD 10/21 20:41