作者Mouseking (叫我老鼠王....-_-)
看板Biotech
标题Re: [闲聊]中兴生化所的那篇Cell
时间Mon Nov 20 21:22:47 2006
※ 引述《wlsino (wlsino)》之铭言:
: figure2C, 0.1-1.6那几个lane,放大看的话细节50-70的位置细节都是一样的
: http://images.cell.com/images/journal_images/0092-8674/PIIS0092867406012256.gr2.lrg.gif
: 未明空间上很多人在谈这个事情﹐大家可以去看看﹐mitbbs.org,biology版
: 我也很奇怪﹐按理说Cell这样的杂志﹐如果是copy&paste的话没道理编辑会看不出来
: ※ 引述《Mouseking (叫我老鼠王....-_-)》之铭言:
: : 同学.....你确定嘛?我觉pattern很像,但仔细看确实是不一样的
: : 你的指控要有根据....这是很大的污辱噎......
: : 不光是对作者和中兴大学....你也污辱审这篇稿的国外学者.....
: : 建议你看清楚在发言....拜托啦!
stop here! you should not compare fractions between lanes, especially
the higher molecular weight area. Inter-lanes comparision is easy to
discriminate that they are from different treatment group, and that's
the key of their experimental design.
Being a scientist, learning to make judgement by yourself is important.
It's a godd chance to practice.....haha...I wrote in English because i
hope that these Mainland scholars who raised the issue could read it!
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.58.54.177
1F:推 fv:comparison?! 11/20 23:58
2F:推 nekosp:They're chinese scholars, or scholars in China 11/24 04:01
3F:→ nekosp:to me. My mainland is Taiwan. 11/24 04:02