※ 引述《wlsino (wlsino)》之铭言： : figure2C, 0.1-1.6那几个lane,放大看的话细节50-70的位置细节都是一样的 : http://images.cell.com/images/journal_images/0092-8674/PIIS0092867406012256.gr2.lrg.gif : 未明空间上很多人在谈这个事情﹐大家可以去看看﹐mitbbs.org,biology版 : 我也很奇怪﹐按理说Cell这样的杂志﹐如果是copy&paste的话没道理编辑会看不出来 : ※ 引述《Mouseking (叫我老鼠王....-_-)》之铭言： : : 同学.....你确定嘛？我觉pattern很像，但仔细看确实是不一样的 : : 你的指控要有根据....这是很大的污辱噎...... : : 不光是对作者和中兴大学....你也污辱审这篇稿的国外学者..... : : 建议你看清楚在发言....拜托啦！ stop here! you should not compare fractions between lanes, especially the higher molecular weight area. Inter-lanes comparision is easy to discriminate that they are from different treatment group, and that's the key of their experimental design. Being a scientist, learning to make judgement by yourself is important. It's a godd chance to practice.....haha...I wrote in English because i hope that these Mainland scholars who raised the issue could read it! --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 210.58.54.177