※ 引述《jmc (cryptomatician)》之铭言： : http://forum.hkbridge.net/index.php : 香港青年队 有个很热闹的讨论串: "香港青年军全军覆没...". 我很快翻了一下. :P 有人说 Intercity 青年组比赛水准低... 对啊, 是不怎麽高. 然後一直有人说台湾两队的防御不够好耶. 不知道. 就我自己的感觉, 後来检讨牌局时, 看到两队主打和叫牌的状况也很多啊. @@ Jerome Cheung 倒是大力推崇了一番: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think, our team still lack stability and the experience in playing in such a long match... In the qualifying rounds, we perform reasonable well, at least we know what's going on at the bridge table... In the KO, we seems cannot concentrate much on the cards. Personally, I have drunk more than 10 cups of coffee throughout the match to retain energy... Maybe there is not too much chances for us to play bridge in high standard for a couple of days continuously But I must admit that the Taiwan Teams are much better in terms of stability. Their play is usually very sound, and their biddings are usually quite reasonably, and their agreements in different situations are usually quite detail. They can retain high level of bridge throughout the whole event. I think that they really deserve the victory, at least I believe they are better than my team in many different prospect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 另外一篇: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 总结... 香港青年队的基本功力唔够好...... 叫牌concepts 可能差唔多, 防守技巧都差唔多, 但系主打不足系我地落败既原因.. 仲有..加上佢地有一位好好既领队...有人作事後讨论...事前分析... 点都好过我地伟大既ARTHUR..好辛苦咁做playing captain... 所以话...mentor对於youth其实好重要... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 事前分析似乎没有, 事後讨论的确不少. 初赛最後一天, 其中一队必须背水一战, 最後 两场若赢得不够多就要被淘汰了. 前晚讨论牌局到凌晨两点, 大概是有一点效果吧. :P 好像我研究和讨论青年组牌局花的时间, 比检讨我自己在公开组比赛所花时间更多. orz --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ※ 编辑: jmc 来自: 61.217.140.196 (10/19 23:01)