作者Morbert (融)
看板EarthScience
标题[新闻] 恐龙是被温室效应冻死的
时间Mon Apr 26 03:28:18 2010
恐龙是被温室效应冻死的 2010.04.25 中广新闻
http://news.chinatimes.com/world/0,5246,50403393x132010042500697,00.html
英国研究人员说,恐龙不是被陨石害死的,而是被温室效应导致的海水降温冻死的。
普里矛斯大学研究人员研究了挪威北极圈的恐龙化石以後认定,一亿三千七百万年以
前,地球的二氧化碳大量增加,气温升高,北极圈的冰层融化,冰水往南流,海水温
度一下子降了摄氏九度。恐龙是冷血动物需要环境的温度让他们保持体温。海水温度
骤降冻死了许多恐龙。
以往科学家认为,恐龙是因为六千五百万年前,一次巨大的变动而灭绝的。一般认为
地球这次大变动是遭到陨石袭击而一下子绝种的。但是负责这项研究的普莱斯说,恐
龙应该是因为海水降温慢慢被冻死的。
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
外电原文:
http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/pages/view.asp?page=29944
Scientists identify freezing times for Cretaceous dinosaurs
2010.04.15 University of Plymouth
Summary
Scientists studying fossils and minerals from Arctic Svalbard, in Norway,
have discovered evidence that the ‘greenhouse’ climate of the Cretaceous
period was punctuated by a sudden drop in global temperatures.
Further detail
The drop is estimated to have occurred some 137 million years ago during a
time when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, and would have seen the islands fall
from an average of 13 degrees centigrade (ocean temperature) to as low as
four degrees.
The findings, which were published in the journal Geology and featured as a
highlight in Nature Geoscience, will further contribute to the debate over
climate change as they appear to contradict the common model which links
high levels of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) – as recorded in the Cretaceous era –
with reduced polar ice caps.
Despite being located in the Arctic Circle, Svalbard was home to numerous
species of dinosaur and was typically characterised by warm, shallow seas
and swamps.
But the research team, led by Dr Gregory Price of the University of Plymouth,
found evidence in fossils and carbonate materials preserved in marine rocks
in the region of a transient shift to cooler glacial conditions around 137
million years ago.
Dr Price said: "At certain times in the geological past, the world has been
dominated by greenhouse conditions with elevated CO2 levels and warm Polar
Regions, and hence, these are seen as analogues of future global climate.
“But this research suggests that for short periods of time the Earth plunged
back to colder temperatures, which not only poses interesting questions in
terms of how the dinosaurs might have coped, but also over the nature of
climate change itself.”
Dr Price, along with Dr Elizabeth Nunn, of Johannes Gutenburg Universitat
in Mainz, Germany, first visited Svalbard in 2005 to collect fossils and
samples, in an area famed for a number of paleontological discoveries,
including giant marine reptiles such as pliosaurs and icthyosaurs.
The samples were analysed back in Plymouth and prompted return trips to the
area to gather more evidence.
“The flourishing of the dinosaurs and a range of other data indicates that
the Cretaceous period was considerably warmer and boasted a high degree of
CO2 in the atmosphere,” said Dr Price.
“But over a period of a few hundred or a few thousand years, ocean
temperatures fell from an average of 13 degrees centigrade to between eight
and four degrees.
“Although a short episode of cool polar conditions is potentially at odds
with a high CO2 world, our data demonstrates the variability of climate over
long timescales.”
ENDS
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.194.194.153
1F:推 ICEFTP:那二氧化碳大增是什麽事件导致的? 陨石击中地球...= = 04/26 08:05
2F:推 biostar:那次大灭绝主因已明确指出是小行星撞击,连陨石坑都找到了 04/26 08:12
3F:推 biostar:如果是单纯气温变冷的话,生物可以靠迁徙至热带来应对 04/26 08:15
4F:→ biostar:虽然说还是会造成很多物种灭绝,但是不会是大规模全面性 04/26 08:15
5F:推 ICEFTP:应该说科学家找到很多可能造成生物灭绝的原因,但最开始 04/26 08:19
6F:→ ICEFTP:引起这一连串事件的原因是什麽? 是陨石撞击那就确定为主因 04/26 08:20
7F:→ angeronly:记者是白X吗 看完原文再来看报导真的快昏倒 04/26 08:20
8F:→ angeronly:看了好几遍还是看不出来原文有表达出跟报导接近的意思.. 04/26 08:27
9F:推 ICEFTP:原因只是在讨论海水温度急降及CO2浓度的关系 04/26 08:28
10F:→ ICEFTP:原"文"只是在讨论海水温度急降及CO2浓度的关系 (修正) 04/26 08:29
11F:→ ICEFTP:CO2及甲烷的对於气候的严重影响也可见於二叠─三叠纪灭绝 04/26 08:30
12F:→ ICEFTP:事件 但那次的灭绝进行时间很长 但也很全面 04/26 08:31
13F:→ angeronly:而且包含海洋大型爬虫类---->>这根本不是恐龙啊.... 04/26 08:33
14F:→ angeronly:还恐龙是冷血动物所以被冻死 挖靠这个也掰太大了吧.... 04/26 08:33
15F:→ angeronly:记者知道耻字怎麽写吗 还冒充研究人员说话 都他在讲... 04/26 08:36
16F:→ speed2:每隔一段时间就出现恐龙的另一种死法,科学也不要尽信 XD 04/26 11:00
17F:推 hoseumou:重点在於台湾媒体在翻译科普新闻时 只会粗略将外国新闻 04/26 11:12
18F:→ hoseumou:翻译 而不会去理解该新闻 研究的实际内容 04/26 11:13
19F:→ hoseumou:而媒体也多半没有科普知识 04/26 11:13
20F:→ hoseumou:我甚至看过中国媒体在翻译恐龙新闻时 制造一大段原文 04/26 11:15
21F:→ hoseumou:研究里没有的内容 04/26 11:15
22F:推 hoseumou:与其说科学不能尽信 不如果媒体不能尽信 直接看研究就知 04/26 11:18
23F:推 hoseumou: 说 04/26 11:20
24F:→ angeronly:不用说中国媒体 这篇就是台湾媒体也是这样搞啊 04/26 11:54
25F:推 gnt:有的时候就是某个研究人员的PAPER 大家都看很多了 04/26 12:50
26F:→ gnt:内容是不是一定都对 加上媒体喜欢挑耸动的报 自己判断吧 04/26 12:51
27F:→ angeronly:问题是原文内容根本不是这样...... 04/26 12:51
28F:→ Morbert:所以在贴新闻时 特地去把原文挖出来一起贴 :P 04/26 14:16
29F:推 tyb1030:他不是记者,是编译,九成以上外电都是编译处理,请勿骂错人 04/26 15:10
30F:推 kill90206:这...谁跟你说恐龙是变温动物了 04/27 00:16
31F:→ kill90206:1.从爬虫类看恐龙->变温动物 2.从鸟类看->恒温动物 04/27 00:19
32F:→ kill90206:两个假说至今仍未有个定论 这个编译有够厉害 04/27 00:20
33F:→ rogergon:关键字:英国研究、台湾媒体 04/27 10:54