作者Majestic (认真向上好青年!)
看板Economics
标题Re: [讨论] 差别利率
时间Fri Apr 7 01:52:09 2006
※ 引述《liton (欧吉桑留学生)》之铭言:
: : 推 McGyver:所以我的下一个疑问是 规定开始要采用差别利率 会不会其实 04/06 13:11
: : → McGyver:效果还是一样? 还是只有那些高风险的人去借而已? 04/06 13:11
: I think.. you are a student
: you are asking a question which is not a question
: In the real world, there are not economic theories everywhere.
: And never try to put all phenomena into economic theories
: -------------------------------------------------------------------
: The key risk factor is transformation.
: Transform "application form" into "score card"
: Transform "score card" into "interest rate spread"
: If you have run any econometric model,
: you would find that adjuested R square running up to 60% or 70%
: already have powerful explanatory ability.
: Suppose the adjusted R squre represtnts the forecasting
: accuracy of bad debt ratio and we have a adjusted R square of 75%.
: And the accurate bad debt ratio is 15%.
: Therefore you forecast the bad debt ratio is 11.25%
: How much margin spread should you charge if
: the current (saving) interest rate is 1%
: the recovery rate is 0%, and there is no friction cost?
: 1+1%=(1+R)(1-15%) ---> R=18%
: 1+1%=(1+r)(1-11.25%)---> r=13.8%
如果今天银行高估坏帐率,假设银行估的坏帐率为16%
那麽 1+1%=(1+r)(1-16%) ---> r=20.238%
这个利率相当接近一年20%的法定上限
在这个情况下,不就变成银行会超收?
如果银行在预估坏帐率准确的情况下,又若借方的讯息比贷方讯息多
那麽超收利率是绝对有可能的情形
我的问题是: 如果我是银行,如果预估坏帐率是"不准"的
那麽我会倾向低坏帐率还是高坏帐率?
: The adverse selection exists because banks cannot
: identify who is the lemon; therefore banks face only
: downside risk and cannot enjoy upside benefit.
: It's no surprise banks suffer from low forecasting accuracy.
: How can you judge the credit of the debtor only by a paper?
: But it should be the destiny of the cash card (and credit card)
: Card card features its convenience and simplicity.
: If banks want to increas its forecasting accuracy
: of bad debt ratio and adopt different spread levels,
: they would enhance the credit investigation process.
: But if banks ehance the process, it is not cash card any more.
: -------------------------------------------------------------------
: The key is not adverse selection.
: Banks cannot forecast the bad debt ratio well now.
: How can they adopt different spread levels?
: So..forget the spread levels. It's only an unreachable gift.
http://www.ettoday.com/2006/04/01/320-1924094.htm
根据新闻,每个月都按时缴款的人才能享受银行的优惠利率
所以一开始是银行去选择低利率的人,而不是借款人直接去找银行
不过就liton大所言,若真的adjusted R square已经具有70%左右的解释能力
那麽问题就变成是: 为什麽银行事先没办法解决现在所谓的"卡债问题"
什麽样的情形导致了现在的卡奴问题? 是银行的错还是card holder的问题?
除了从application form 到scored card到interest rate spread外
借方事前少做了什麽,或做了什麽不该做的事,让借方的坏帐风险提高?
--
谦
虚
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.132.77.54
※ 编辑: Majestic 来自: 220.132.77.54 (04/07 02:10)