EngTalk 板


LINE

I’d like just murmuring, and practice my writing. Recently, I peer reviewed two technical articles which are written by two of my juniors in Department of Env. Eng., National Cheng Kung University. One of them is a dissertation (By the way, he had acquired his PhD degree this week, congratulations!), and the other is a journal paper. In the part of result and discussion, I suggested both of them to survey more literatures to support their finding, and eliminate all the contradictions in their studies. I don’t even ask them to do more experiment. However, subsequently, I don’t receive any of their modified versions anymore. Well, actually I am not surprised. Imaging that you are writing your thesis, and perhaps everything is settled down including the date of defense, how can you accept any criticism to point out the logical error in your thesis? If you write a paper for publish and get ready to submit it, how can you respect any suggestion of changing your functional indicators, mathematical formula, or even, wording? Actually, what all they expected is, requiring someone who is capable of writing technical article, proofread their manuscript. It is hard to convince them to accept the other’s comment, especially after their advisor’s guarantee. There was a Guest Professor, Olive Hao, who is the chief editor of Chemosphere, in our department. His task was to offer advice to those PhD students who want to get published. However, it seemed like no one in our department can follow his instruction completely, because he is too picky and even ask student to redo their experiment. Honestly, I’d like also to punch his face at that time, especially due to his unfriendly attitude. But now, since I have enriched my experiences of publish, I started to realize all the requirements from Professor Hao were not too over, instead, they were basic. It is just like an old saying from Zhuangzi: “You cannot talk about a frozen scene with a summer insect.” Once you have been criticized by the strict reviewers, you know what a nice paper looks like, and you won’t compromise anymore. ...to be continued --



※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 207.151.231.208
1F:推 zofloya:well, most people want an easy way out 04/02 13:15
2F:推 halagirl:As a graduate student, I totally agree with your view 05/30 00:00







like.gif 您可能会有兴趣的文章
icon.png[问题/行为] 猫晚上进房间会不会有憋尿问题
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] 选了错误的女孩成为魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一张
icon.png[心得] EMS高领长版毛衣.墨小楼MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龙隔热纸GE55+33+22
icon.png[问题] 清洗洗衣机
icon.png[寻物] 窗台下的空间
icon.png[闲聊] 双极の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售车] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四门
icon.png[讨论] 能从照片感受到摄影者心情吗
icon.png[狂贺] 贺贺贺贺 贺!岛村卯月!总选举NO.1
icon.png[难过] 羡慕白皮肤的女生
icon.png阅读文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[问题] SBK S1安装於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 旧woo100绝版开箱!!
icon.pngRe: [无言] 关於小包卫生纸
icon.png[开箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 简单测试
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 执行者16PT
icon.png[售车] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑战33 LV10 狮子座pt solo
icon.png[闲聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主购教学
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量产版官方照无预警流出
icon.png[售车] Golf 4 2.0 银色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提篮汽座(有底座)2000元诚可议
icon.png[问题] 请问补牙材质掉了还能再补吗?(台中半年内
icon.png[问题] 44th 单曲 生写竟然都给重复的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 华南红卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[问题] 拔牙矫正这样正常吗
icon.png[赠送] 老莫高业 初业 102年版
icon.png[情报] 三大行动支付 本季掀战火
icon.png[宝宝] 博客来Amos水蜡笔5/1特价五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鲜人一些面试分享
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二创漫画翻译
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] OGN中场影片:失踪人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[问题] 台湾大哥大4G讯号差
icon.png[出售] [全国]全新千寻侘草LED灯, 水草

请输入看板名称,例如:BabyMother站内搜寻

TOP