作者Chrishna (干!波士顿大屠杀)
看板Examination
标题[情报] 第三次明诺布鲁克会议
时间Thu Sep 25 13:34:09 2008
原文来自英文维基百科。
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnowbrook_Conference)
由於这个礼拜才开始读行政学,
所以如果有什麽术语翻译错误,
或是意思搞混,
还请版上先进多多指教。m(_._)m
===============================正文===================================
Minnowbrook III (2008)
Minnowbrook III was held September 3-7, 2008. The theme for the third
gathering was: The Future of Public Administration, Public Management, and
Public Service Around the World. It consisted of two phases.
第三次明诺布鲁克会议於两千零八年九月三至七日召开。此次集会主题为:
公共行政的未来,公共管理,以及全球公共服务。本次会议由两个阶段构成。
Minnowbrook III Phase One (September 3-5) was again held at Syracuse
University's Minnowbrook Conference Center in the Adirondack Mountains. This
was a "preconference workshop" for emerging scholars nominated by senior
scholars in the field. The 56 invited attendees were more diverse than
previous Minnowbrook conferences in terms of race, gender and nationality,
involving for the most part assistant professors but including several
tenured associate professors of public administration. A sizable percentage
of the attendees were affiliated with Syracuse University, the conference
host, and Kansas University, home to the sole participant who had attended
both earlier conferences. The Phase One conference, one full day plus two
half days, was professionally facilitated. The Maxwell School of Citizenship
and Public Affairs at Syracuse University sponsored Phase One attendees' room
and board, meals, and registration fees for Phase Two.
第一阶段於九月三至五日,在雪城大学的明诺布鲁克会议中心举办。此阶段
为会前工作坊,参加者为公共行政领域耆老所推荐的新锐学者。从种族、性
别与国籍来看,这五十六位受邀的与会者比上一次会议所呈现的差异更大。
他们大多为助理教授,不过有几位是已经获得终身职的副教授。相当大比例
的出席者与雪城大学及堪萨斯大学有关。第一阶段总共有一个整天和两个半
天,针对专业讨论所设计的。雪城大学的马克斯威公民权与公共事务学院赞
助了第一阶段与会者的食宿及第二阶段的注册费。
The outcome of Minnowbrook III Phase One, rather than a single formal
critique, involved summaries of concerns and future directions representing a
dozen focal areas presented to senior scholars and attendees at the opening
session of Phase Two. These included academic-practitioner relations;
democratic performance management; financial management;
globalization/comparative perspectives; information technology & management;
law, politics & public administration management; leadership;
methods/interdisciplinary; networks; performance measurement; public
administration values & theory; social equity & justice; and transparency &
accountability.
阶段一讨论的结果并非单一的形式性批判,而毋宁是对本领域关切议题及未
来方向的总结。这些总结即是阶段二的开场会议中,呈现在资深学者及与会
者面前的十几个核心领域。包括:学术—从事实务者的关系;民主表现管理
;财政管理;全球化/比较的观点;资讯科技与管理;法律、政治及公共行
政管理;领导;研究方法/科技整合;网络;表现测量;公共行政的诸多价
值与理论;社会平等与正义;以及透明度与课责性。
The group interested in globalized perspectives encouraged a renaissance of
comparative studies as the world has become increasingly interdependent. The
essence of the comparative approach is context-sensitivity, that is,
awareness that institutional and cultural context matters and should be
incorporated into research. Contributions of this approach are practical for
meeting curricular needs, and theoretical in making research more rigorous,
revealing underlying, often US-oriented assumptions and exploring alternative
contexts.
着眼於全球化观点的团体支持重新找回比较研究领域,因为全球互赖的程度
越来越高。比较途径的本质在於容易受到脉络影响,亦即必须意识到制度与
文化脉络十分重要,并且应该被纳入研究之中。此一研究途径的贡献在於,
符合课程实际需求,而且在理论方面可以使研究更为精确,揭露出隐含的,
通常是美国导向的预设,并且探索其他可能的脉络。
The group interested in public administration values and theory offered a
reformulation of public administration, defining public administration as: "a
socially-embedded process of collective relationships, dialogue, and action
to promote human flourishing for all." Questions arising from the
reformulation included how public administration might recognize competing
values and whether a critical consciousness regarding public administration
should be encouraged.
对於公共行政的诸多价值与理论有兴趣的小组,提供了对於公共行政重新架
构的看法。他们把公共行政定义为:「促进所有人类繁荣的集体关系、对话
,以及行动之社会镶嵌过程」。重新架构过程中出现的问题包括:公共行政
如何能够肯认竞争价值,以及针对公共行政的批判意识是否应该被鼓励?
The group that discussed research methods proposed a statement of commitment
document, informally referred to as a pledge or a manifesto, asking new
scholars to serve as change agents regarding the use and teaching of research
methods and the responsiveness of the peer-review process. One element of
this was more attention to the method of action research to increase
engagement with the issues and practice of public administration; another was
a commitment to methodological pluralism.
讨论研究方法的小组提出了一个承诺声明文件(非正式地被当成作为一项誓
言或宣言),要求新进学者成为研究方法使用与教导以及同侪审查过程的改
革推动者。要素之一就是多加注意行动研究的方法,以增进对研究议题与公
共行政实践的接合;另一个则是对於方法论多元主义的认同。
The comparatively brief Phase One, spread over three days and highly
structured, may have contributed to its diffuse outcome. Many participants
were interested in further discussion on the proposed re-definition of the
field, and on pursuing ratification of the methods group's pledge toward
reshaping the field. Despite the cordial and pluralistic atmosphere,
clarifications and disagreements could not be fully pursued. Other interim
discussions simply ran out of time.
阶段一相对简短,在三天中完成并且受到紧密安排,可能是其讨论结果涉及
诸多面向的原因。许多与会者对於提议将这个领域重新定义,以及要求承认
重塑此一领域的方法论小组之宣言的进一步讨论感兴趣。尽管充满了真挚与
多元的氛围,问题的澄清与异议无法得到完全进行,甚至没有时间进行其他
临时讨论。
Minnowbrook III Phase Two (September 5-7) was offered in Lake Placid, New
York as a more traditional academic conference to which scholars throughout
the world were invited to submit proposals. About 300 proposals were
submitted of which 80 were accepted. Following the opening session
presentation from Phase One participants, the emerging scholars and senior
scholars met in roundtable format to discuss the specific ideas presented. In
most subsequent sessions, participants limited paper presentations to allow
for enhanced discussion of the material in reference to the ideas presented
and developed in the opening roundtables.
第三次明诺布鲁克会议的第二阶段(九月五~七日)在纽约的宁静湖举行,
是一个较为传统的学术会议,邀请来自世界各地的学者提交文章大纲。此次
会议收到三百篇左右的大纲,其中八十篇被接受。在阶段一参与者於开场会
议报告之後,新锐研究者与资深学者便针对特定概念想法以圆桌讨论形式会
谈。在接下来的绝大多数场次中,与会者为了让论文中与开场圆桌论坛相关
的想法能够得到进一步讨论,限制了报告时间。
A trivial fact of note is that the conference was originally scheduled to
take place on the campus of Syracuse University in late September 2008. It
was rescheduled because the original dates overlapped with Rosh Hashanah.
举办时间因为犹太教的新年所以改变(懒得翻了)。
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.119.145.248
1F:推 tseng1304:推一个,原po真是太热心了^^ 09/25 13:35
2F:→ Chrishna:因为不考文化,改考一般行政,只好逼自己热心一点 XD 09/25 13:38
3F:推 liboy99:推 妖兽还分2阶段... 09/25 13:41
4F:推 WizZ:明年还会再出XD 09/25 13:48
5F:推 lockinboy:所以年底会考比较行政? 09/25 13:48
6F:推 zwa:我的天阿 被程明说中了 还真的有第三次 在2008年=.= 09/25 13:48
7F:推 liboy99:要看看老师有没有 精要版的.. 补习班应该会出吧...y 09/25 13:51
8F:→ liboy99:当初我也是听程明老师说的.. 没考上就要再准备这个=.= 09/25 13:52
9F:推 lockinboy:第三次明诺布鲁克会议与新公共服务的差别为何?试申论之 09/25 13:53
10F:推 KatherineNTU:很推这篇喔,程明老师总复习班也有提到今年要开第三 09/25 13:54
11F:→ KatherineNTU:次会议,考试的时候,我特别记得老师的提醒,把它写 09/25 13:54
12F:→ KatherineNTU:进去了,这题可能因此有得到不错的分数~ 09/25 13:55
13F:推 lorica:还是大杂烩的讨论...希望第三次能真的走出自己的路, 而不是 09/25 13:58
14F:→ lorica:像第二次一样 09/25 13:58
15F:推 liboy99:一般来说 都年轻学者的讨论 我也希望能走自己的路.. 09/25 14:00
16F:→ liboy99:第二次有些有些太理想化了 为顾虑实际面 像科技运用之类的 09/25 14:01
18F:→ lockinboy:papers 有一堆论文 09/25 14:02
19F:→ Players0305:Minnowbrook 不是本来就20年一次吗?! 1968 1988 2008 09/25 14:20
20F:推 jellpop:推荐这篇文章!!!! 09/25 14:35
21F:推 lorica:楼楼上,如果这个会议是因为每20年就办一次,那实在没啥意 09/25 14:49
22F:→ lorica:义,只是为了开会而开会...行政学就真的沦为拾人牙慧的学科 09/25 14:50
23F:→ lorica:其实阶段一的讨论,在其他学科(政治学、社福...)早就有讨论 09/25 14:52
24F:→ lorica:公行学者会比较强、更有见地吗?我是等着看啦... 09/25 14:52
※ insnoodle:转录至看板 NDHU-PA95 09/25 15:08
25F:推 pricky:希望不要考到第四次明诺布鲁克会议T_T 09/25 15:39
26F:推 terry1104:超热心的,感谢你罗 09/25 22:12
27F:→ rrosy:好重要的资料,我都不猪道,原来这是万年会议,没开完 09/25 23:24
28F:→ Mcdona1d:恭禧~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 09/27 11:38
29F:推 Jiahuah:推推!! thanks for your sharing~ 09/30 22:29
※ mentor:转录至某隐形看板 07/04 15:57