※ 引述《lovekyoko (Nothing is impossible扔)》之铭言： : 我有一点小疑问 对於E的解释 : 9.Sunspots, vortices of gas associated with strong electromagnetic activity, : are visible as dark spots on the surface of the Sun but have never been : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : sighted on the Sun's poles or equator. : ^^^^^^^^^^^ : (E)appear as dark spots on the Sun's surface, which have never been sighted : on : E The relative pronoun which should immediately follow its referent; here : which illogically follows surface, and its intended referent, either sunspots : or dark spots, becomes unclear ---------------------------------------------------- 关系代名词只能就近代''句意''通畅的名词 AT考试中,非限定用法 which代整句都是错的 如果不是修辞, which的确可以代老莫或OG提到的那些名词...文法是对的, 端看句意通不通....XD 既然可以代的有那麽多....这种选项都是错误选项 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- : 请问一下 解答说 理论上which应该直接跟在先行词之後 但是这里如果which : 如果指surface句意不通是不是这样? : 然後莫老师说which可能指dark spots和surface所以语意不清 : 但是为什麽解答说either sunspots or dark spots? : 我有点搞糊涂了 为什麽解答会这样说勒 : 还有which前面有个逗点 是因为逗点的非限制用法 所以他一定只surface是这样吗 : 请跟我说一下 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.168.149