作者PINKENVI (是一条不归路)
看板GMAT
标题[语文] FeiFei-82
时间Wed Jul 23 22:10:59 2008
82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits
hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could
always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot
express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing
can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.
Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion
above to be properly drawn?
A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth
cannot furnish definitive proof.
B. The whole truth cannot be known.
C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph
in any sense.
D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence
if there isadditional evidence establishing the truth about the scene
photographed.
E、If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove
definitively the truth about it
恩。我现在在(A)和(D)之间挣扎。
答案是(A)
这是assumption,大部分这类问题都是要取非。但是,如果D要从哪里取非?
那又要如何反驳题目?题目也是要取非吗?
我不太懂。请各位帮忙一下这类ASSUMPTION问题。
谢谢!
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.160.101.50