作者headnobig (Actor)
看板GMAT
标题Re: [问题] 请问GWD5-Q30(CR)
时间Mon Oct 6 01:15:16 2008
Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this
respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since
much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.
思路:
1.题目的推论在句however之後 ,
目的: 反对irradiation对营养造成的损害没有比cooking大
负负得正,可得结论的方向是认为irradtion对营养伤害很大
并不下於cooking
2.以下有两个原因 (因or後平衡两个since)
原因1. 有些食材 是拿来生吃的
原因2. 看到这边我会想到生吃以外的理由
因为题目说 either beside 又说 or else
所以我会想选"熟食造成影响"的理由
C)cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas
irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
选项C说没有指cooking或是irradiation对营养造成的损害和推论无关..
E)for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1
associated with either process individually is compounded
如果有irradiation又有cooking会有加成效果 所以熟食也会造成很大的损害
以上为小弟浅见 有错请指教 <(_ _)>
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.169.194.237
1F:推 yuanyen100:感谢您的帮忙 请帮忙看看我的回文"Orz 10/06 10:32