At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase. The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that (A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available (B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals (C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering (D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer (E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall table 答案是C 已经看过CD、Formosa的讨论串但仍有些许不确定 想要请各位高手帮我确认下这样解释的逻辑有没有错误~麻烦大家帮忙下!谢谢~ <题目大意> 高坐台可以提供比较好的view来看名人，且坐高脚台的客人用餐时间比做一般 坐台用餐的客人时间长，所以H餐厅决定增加高脚台来增加利润。 <我的解释> C.选高脚台的客人是普遍性逗留在H餐厅的例外 (选高脚台的人并非用餐而是看名人，所以停留时间长； 所以如果H餐厅增加高脚台，虽然会使客人增加，但也 会使客人逗留时间增加，餐厅流动率变小，所以餐厅 利润并不会应此增加)---->所以C选项反驳原文 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 60.245.116.133