作者ghtmmm (圣艾修伯里)
看板GRE
标题[问题] 一题逻辑题
时间Tue May 19 21:08:57 2015
Senator: Jones is highly qualified for appointment as a judge, as evidenced
by Jones's receiving a unanimous vote of "qualified" on the formal rating
scale used by the Lawyers' Committee. That committee advises the Senate on
judicial appointments.
Which of the following, if true, is the best reason for dismissing the
senator's claim that Jones is highly qualified?
(A) Several members of the Lawyers' Committee are not themselves qualified for
judicial appointments.
(B) The Lawyers' Committee does not advise the Senate on all judicial
appointments.
(C) The Lawyers' Committee gives a unanimous vote of "qualified" only to those
candidates for judicial appointments who meet the committee's stringent
standards for appropriate prior experience and ethical conduct.
(D) The Lawyers' Committee gives a unanimous vote of either "highly qualified"
or "very highly qualified" to 95 percent of all candidates for judicial
appointments.
(E) Jones, like most lawyers, is a member of the professional organization that
originally suggested the establishment of the Lawyers' Committee.
这题是考weaken,答案D
可是真的搞不太懂
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 60.248.4.126
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/GRE/M.1432040940.A.DF1.html
1F:推 Collier : 我猜,因为题目要不鸟Jones is highly qualified的 05/19 21:44
2F:→ Collier : 理由,因为Committee的评价都乱给,所以没监别度(可 05/19 21:45
3F:→ Collier : 不鸟) 05/19 21:45
4F:推 chenfafa : 我也猜jones到as a judge是果 所以不动 之後的是因 05/19 23:14
5F:→ chenfafa : 所以攻因 abce都无关 05/19 23:14