写在前面: 感谢版友提供连结，小弟我不才试翻一下。 从内文来看，台媒记者记者标题引战无误。 原文作者应该很喜欢Kobe。 但内容上还蛮中立，因为他只是就过去的数据论述事实而已。 有些不会翻的句子还请版友帮忙补充更正。 谢谢。 ------ Howard Beck in The New York Times on the Knicks' win over the Sixers, which featured Jeremy Lin scoring the last eight Knick points in a close game: 来自纽约时报的霍华德贝克，在一场比分接近的比赛中，林书豪替纽约独得八分，带领尼 克打败七六人後说: The game came down to defense, grit and Jeremy Lin’s unwavering self-confidence on a difficult night. 这艰难的一晚造就了林书豪的防守，决断力与不可动摇的自信。 Lin had 16 points in the fourth quarter -- after shooting 1 for 11 in the first three periods -- and scored the Knicks’ last 8 points, all from the foul line. 林在第四节得16分，并且最後8罚8中，而这是在前三节11投1中後发生的。 “It’s just a credit to my teammates, how they kept the game close for me,” he said. “Man, the way they defended was unbelievable.” “这都要归功於我的队友，他们为了我使比分如此接近”林说道: “老兄，他们防守的方式真是难以置信。” I read it once. I read it again. 我读了一遍，我又再读了一遍林书豪说的话。 And I simply could not get past it. They kept the game close ... "for me?" 我单纯地不想让这句话就这麽过去，他们使比分如此接近，"为了我?" I wasn't there. I didn't here his intonation. I'm not going to pretend I know what he meant by "for me." It may have meant something selfless, like "despite my bad shooting." 我当时并不在现场。我没听到他的语气。我不想假装说我知道他说”为了我”的含义。那 可能表示了无私，例如说“尽管投的如此糟糕” But it also sounded just a little bit like a cold-blooded crunch-time killer. A little like Kobe Bryant. A little like: Of course the ball's going to be in my hands at the end kind of way. 但这似乎听起来有点像冷血的关键时刻杀手。 有点像Kobe Bryant。有点像是: “到关键 时刻当然就是我要出手的时候” Which is not the craziest idea out there. 这并不是那样一个疯狂的主意。 Ever since he waved off a coach, a teammate and a playcall before hitting the biggest bucket of his life -- that game-winning 3 in isolation in Toronto -- it has struck me that in terms of crunch-time temperament, Lin is as much like Bryant as anyone. 自从对暴龙那一场他把教练，把队友给挥走，然後自己投进那颗致胜三分球後，他那种关 键时刻舍我其谁的态度“感动了我”，就像Bryant一样。 They are both standouts of work ethic. Both, I sense, feel they have worked too damned hard to entrust the results of close games to chance. Each knows he has put in the time and is prepared to do what needs to be done. 他们俩个在工作伦理上都很杰出。两个，我都察觉到，他们都工作的如此努力，而把接近 的比赛的胜负扛起。他们俩个都知道，他们为比赛的付出，而且都准备好去做该完成的事 情。 At the end of close games, on offense in the NBA, and in defiance of the evidence, that almost always means dominating the ball. 在NBA接近的比赛的尾声，无视於证据下，总是表示了大量的持球。 Just to test the idea that Lin and Bryant are similarly ball dominant in crunch time, I fired up NBA.com's fancy secret new stats tool, and found Lin does like to have the ball in his hands in crunch time, almost as much as Bryant, who is an all-timer in that regard. 为了测试林和Bryant在关键时刻的持球比率的相似性，我用了一些NBA.com中心的想 像的秘密统计工具，然後发现，林的确喜欢在关键时刻更多地持球，几乎跟Bryant一样喜 欢，Bryant则是无时无刻都喜欢持球。 In the final five minutes of games within five points, Bryant's usage rate is a high 42.4. Lin's is close behind, at 36.6 -- higher than, say, Chris Paul's 33.9, and in the same range as Kevin Durant (40.1) and Carmelo Anthony (43.5). You might say that's heady stuff for a player whose coach keeps reminding people is effectively a rookie. 在比分差5分以下的五场比赛中，Bryant的使用比率是很高的42.4，林书豪则是很接近地 36.6，比CP3的33.9还高，跟Kevein Durant(40.3)和甜瓜(43.5)差不多。你可能会说(这 句不会翻) Don't be surprised if he keeps putting it on himself to create Knick points late 不要太讶异，如果他保持这样在比赛末段得分。 Ask any superstar, though, and they'll tell you that would be surprising is if he can maintain that 58 percent true shooting percentage with a high usage rate if and when the whole defense starts tilting his way. 问问任何一位明星球员，然後他们会告诉你，在面各队的重点防守下，他可以在如此高的 使用率中保持58%的真实命中率是会很令人讶异的。 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 112.104.139.112