※ [本文转录自 historia 看板] 作者: Geigemachen () 看板: historia 标题: [情报]男女较平等的某些古代语言 时间: Mon Jan 30 23:28:15 2006 　 人类　 　男人　　 女人 古英文 man wer-man wif-man (复数men) 古拉丁文 homo vir femina/mulier (复数homines) 古希腊文 anthropos andres gynaikes (复数anthropoi) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed#Greek_version Some Christian communions, in particular the World Council of Churches and the Presbyterian Church (USA), omit the word "men", and others substitute the word "all" , in the line "for us men and for our salvation..." This is considered a more gender-neutral translation of nos homines ("we men"). The frequency of usage of this variation is, however, unknown. "Homo" in Latin, however, means "human being" more than "man" — Latin "vir" means "man". However, later in Latin this changed, with "homo" meaning "man". Interestingly enough, the same is true of English. In Old English, "man" meant "human being", with "wer-man" and "wif-man" meaning "man" and "woman" respectively. Old English "wer" is directly cognate with Latin "vir". Thus, modern gender neutrality here may be more historically and etymologically correct, interestingly enough, because the matter does not even arise in the original Greek: there the word "anthropoi" (humans or human beings) is used, as opposed to "andres" (men), or "gynaikes" (women). The issue is therefore limited only to certain ways of translating the original Greek into various languages, as the original itself has always been gender-neutral. -- 上月球!月球是中国人吴刚不可分割的一部分 抓嫦娥!此女意图分裂中国领土脱离中国掌握 杀玉兔!玉兔为资产阶级之玩物!日帝之玩偶! --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.121.88.12 -- 上月球!月球是中国人吴刚不可分割的一部分 抓嫦娥!此女意图分裂中国领土脱离中国掌握 杀玉兔!玉兔为资产阶级之玩物!日帝之玩偶! --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.121.88.12