http://ppt.cc/E7!T（原文出处，请搭配服用） In the final minutes of Oklahoma City’s game four battle against the Denver Nuggets, Russell Westbrook made a couple terrible decisions. Decisions that may or may not have costed Oklahoma City the game. And while the poor shots that Westbrook took were in large part his fault, I feel like he is getting too much of the blame. 雷霆与金块上一战最後几分钟，Westbrook 在球场上做出了两个糟糕的 决断，导致球队输球。虽然 Westbrook 的滥射为千夫所指，但我认为错 不全在他。 The reason why I feel this way is because in key situations where Westbrook took a bad shot, there were other people involved (whether it be a player/coach). Looking at the two biggest plays of the game gives us examples: 因为在他做出糟糕投射选择的几个关键 play 中，其他球员或教练也脱 不了干系。就让我们来看最关键的两个 play。 （影片） On this play, the Thunder get the basketball with 52 seconds left. Trailing by two points, you want to give yourself the most chances to get the win/tie, and this means get the most possessions you can. In this particular case, the Thunder need to get a two for one. If they score, they get one more possession to go for the win. If they don’t score, they don’t have to foul to get the ball back. 这个 play 里，输 2 分雷霆得到球权时，比赛时间还有 52 秒。最理想 的方式当然是尽可能把握追平比数或赢球的机会，这意味着拿到越多球 权越好。所以这波攻势快速拿个两分是较好的选择，因为这样球队还可以 把握正规赛时间终了前的最後一波攻势；即使这波没得分，也没有犯规的 必要。 The start of this play is a big problem with the Thunder taking way too long to get in their set. By the time they actually are doing anything that resembles getting into an offense, there is just 12 seconds left on the shot clock. At 10 seconds left on the shot clock (36 seconds overall), Durant gets the basketball with Raymond Felton covering him. Instead of shooting, he gives the ball back to Westbrook, who hesitates, takes a dribble, and then shoots. 这个 play 从开始便大有问题，雷霆队员们就位花太多时间了。当他们 真的开始跑进攻时，进攻时间只剩下 12 秒。当时间来到 10 秒（比赛 时间 36 秒），KD 终於拿到球，此时他面对的是 Felton 的防守。KD 没有投球，而是回传给 Westbrook；Westbrook 犹豫了一下，运球後投 篮。 Westbrook is at fault here for two reasons, with the first being it takes him way too long to get into the offense. To me, it is as if he is trying to run the shot clock all of the way down, instead of trying to secure the two for one. Also, upon making the catch from Kevin Durant, it needs to be a catch and shoot three. The hesitation and dribble throws him off (in addition to wasting more time), and that can contribute to the miss. 这里 Westbrook 做错了两件事：第一，太慢启动进攻。就我来看，好像 他是想把时间消耗掉，而不是拿个保险的两分。第二，他犹豫了。对他 来说最好的进攻选择，是接到来自 KD 的传球时，来个 catch and shoot 丢三分。犹豫和运球让他的投篮变得仓促（同时浪费更多时间），这也 可以解释他为什麽没扔进。 However, Kevin Durant is also at fault. The Thunder are running a play designed to get a switch and take advantage of the mismatch. They force the Nuggets into switching Ty Lawson onto Durant. They get the mismatch they are looking for and when Durant catches the basketball he doesn’t look to take advantage. With 10 seconds left on the shot clock, if Durant wants to shoot it and perserve the two for one, he can, and it would be a good shot. Instead, he gives it back to Westbrook, and I have to assume he wasn’t expecting this, and that hesitation is a pretty good indication of it. 不过 KD 也有错。雷霆跑这个 play 的目的原来是要迫对手换防，以争 取错位的机会。他们让 Lawson 被迫守到 KD（译按：此处应有误）。雷 霆理想中的错位出现了，但他没有去利用这个优势。当进攻时间剩下 10 秒，如果他想投篮并拿个保险的两分，他可以这麽做，而且那会是个好 选择。但他没有，反而是把球丢回给 Westbrook，我猜想 Westbrook 并 没有预料到球会回到他手上，所以他犹豫了。 The next big play that Westbrook is getting hammered for is his three point shot down three basically in transition: 下个关键 play Westbrook 在落後三分的攻守转换之情况下，丢了个糟 糕的三分球，被骂惨了。 （影片） Here, Westbook gets the basketball from James Harden, dribbles it up, and fires a three point shot, one that he airballs. Terrible decision and a terrible shot for sure. However, there are others to blame here as well, specifically coach Scott Brooks. 这里，Westbrook 接获 Harden 的传球，运球到前场投了个面包。这绝 对是糟糕的决断与糟糕的投射。但是，还有其他人应该被骂，尤其是教 练 Scott Brooks。 Normally coaches don’t call timeout in these situations because the coach wants to catch the defense off guard. However, because of some extra pushing and shoving (in addition to an armbar), the play was blown dead and the ball was reset on the baseline. Any advantage was taken away right there. Instead of calling timeout, Brooks let his guys play. 正常来说教练不会在这种情况下叫暂停，因为他们希望控球後卫的防守 压力能因此减轻（译按：这里金块打全场防守，若雷霆有效突破，则通 常能创造出绝佳的空档）。但是，金块在此对持球者做了额外的压迫。 这个 play 已经被守死没有搞头，球也被压迫到边线，没有任何优势可 以倚仗了。Brooks 并没有叫暂停，而是让他的球员们自己打。 Westbrook took a poor shot, yes, but were the Thunder in anything close to looking like a set? Not really now, Durant was standing in the corner defended, and nothing else was really going on. Westbrook 投了个很糟糕的球，是的，但雷霆看起来有任何像在跑进攻 的样子吗？也没有吧。KD 站在底角被看管住，也看不出什麽其他可能出 现的进攻配合。 Their next possession trailing by four points the Thunder did call a timeout, and this is what they came up with: 当雷霆的落後来到 4 分时，他们叫了暂停，以下是他们的成果： （影片） Now is a three point make guaranteed for Durant coming out of a timeout? No (especially considering Durant tends to get shoved out of position late in games and the defense isn’t really getting into him hard up 4 vs. when up 3 – wanting to prevent the foul and such). Still, the Thunder were the best team coming out of timeouts, so why not call a timeout and give your guys a chance? 这是一个设计给 KD 的三分出手机会吗？不（理由是 KD 在比赛末段容 易被推挤失位，且此时防守方因为领先四分，所以给 KD 的压力不若领 先三分时强，因为他们不想犯规）。不过，雷霆还是联盟中叫暂停後表 现最好的球队，所以有机会的时候就叫个暂停吧。（译按：本段翻译有 不确定之处，还请指正。） -- 一点平衡看法。 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.120.51.64 ※ 编辑: sssfrost 来自: 140.120.51.64 (04/28 11:18) ※ poning:转录至看板 Thunder 04/28 11:21