作者lerudit (l'Erudit)
看板PhD
标题Re: [问题] 各位前辈学长,请问你们一天时间的规划갠…
时间Sat Apr 22 01:40:08 2006
※ 引述《ReLocal (奇蹟小子)》之铭言:
: 标题: Re: [问题] 各位前辈学长,请问你们一天时间的规划갠…
: 时间: Fri Apr 21 14:48:10 2006
:
: --
:
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
: ◆ From: 140.116.35.144
: 推 warners:对..至少也可以知道国外的步调..不错的就学起来..哈~ 04/21 17:02
: 推 kalamucho:推一下~ 我最希望看到的也是交流以找出 "台湾学界要如何 04/21 17:18
: → kalamucho:(eventually)追上国际一流" 的具体改进方针/资讯/知识:) 04/21 17:29
: 推 kalamucho:↑ 我认为亚洲来说,日本和以色列都可算 well-balanced; 04/21 17:38
: → kalamucho:国内能产出优秀的研究者,又持续有效地向西方产学界取经 04/21 17:46
: → kalamucho:[补]上述"国际一流"是指 US top 10-20; top ~5 不可能啦 04/21 19:07
I think, there have already been too many discussions relating to reputation
lists in Taiwan. I think ReLocal is right. As long as you have not stopped
thinking the reputation and put attention on 'how we can do it better',
you won't be able to get on the right position and do somethhing really
helpful.
So, I would suggest to forget whatever top whatever, possible or impossible
missions. It doesn't matter that Taiwan would be better than the US
9 o'clock next Monday or next decade. The most important is, whether Taiwan
will be better next Monday than yesterday.
It would be helpful if talking about something very practical; might be not
big deal, but does help. I dared to share how some foreign schools to deal
with safety issue and working hour in an article recently. Why don't you
start a topic for something you think is helpful and very real. We will be
happy to share your points.
However, always arguing about 'first class' and 'top whatever' just makes here
more and more boring. Anyway...
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 81.111.56.53
1F:→ kalamucho:奇怪。嫌无聊你就跳过去啊,有人拿枪逼你看啊 !? 04/22 02:55
2F:推 littlest:你还是乖乖跳过这篇不要PO废文吧~~以老卖老的 04/22 16:42
3F:推 Aser:原po说的很正确啊 那是重点 04/23 13:41