※ 引述《dearevan (有情有义流浪汉)》之铭言： : 听某某学长说很你嚣张以为自己实验都会作唷 : 我愣了一下想说我没有这样表示阿 : 那学姊就提醒我说是因为我去实习的时候 : 学长问我知不知道这实验怎麽做(大学有学过的实验) : 我想说大学的时候学过也作过就直接说..恩..我知道 : 就因为这样让学长对我的印象不是很好 : 觉得我好像自以为什麽都懂 : 学姊就提醒我说...就算你懂...也要装不懂多问几次 : 不然对方会把你当作目中无人的家伙 : 当下让我大彻大悟 : 学术圈，要低调 : 不然你怎麽死的都不知道!!! : OS:学姊我知道你会看这边的文章，不要砍我啦，小的知错了~~~orz I don't think this situation only exists in academic circle. Basically, it is a sort of office culture. I don't think this is your problem but rather that guy's problem. You cannot really judge a people barely by a very first imagination. Surely, this is a part of PhD training. Also, to judge a new-coming student whatever is not really a clever manner. When you say somebody recognises he or he knows everything, you should bear iin mind that, there is possibility that that is true, and even know more than you to some extents. Your story also reflects a ridiculous relation issue. In Taiwanese culture, PhD students have ranks, like in Army, and this rank is set depending on when the student joins the group. It seems the 'higher-rank' students' opinions are always right and they can order lower-rank students to do some works. Certainly, they know more than the lower rank students; however, they are still colleagues. This should not exist among students in a research group. I was lucky that I did my degree in a place without such culture. We called all the members in the group by their first names. In seminar, we asked questions and criticises each others works. In playfield, we were football players in a team again the other. For the rest of our lives, we are friends. PhD students are trained from the first day to recognise the doctors are at the same level as themselves. Students won't be always correct, and lecturers might be wrong. Always think, and think, and think, and think. There is nobody always correct, so you got to find all evidences to support your point and think of them ----- this is independent research. However, if in a system supervisors' words are kings' laws and 'old' students suggestions are taken as prime ministers' orders, then how their graduates can face the cruel world after they leave the group? How can their graduates think independently? I quite doubt. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 81.111.56.53 ※ 编辑: lerudit 来自: 81.111.56.53 (05/13 05:57)