※ [本文转录自 basketballTW 看板] 作者: skchang (skchang) 看板: basketballTW 标题: 周俊三的论文 时间: Thu Apr 1 15:57:30 2004 资料来源：全国硕博士论文资讯网 ****************************** 国家图书馆索书号: 系统编号: 91NCPE5419007 　　　　　出版年: 民2003/07/16 　　　　　研究生: 周俊三 Chun-San Chou (以研究生姓名查询国家图书馆索书号 ，未查获者表国图尚未典藏) (以研究生姓名查询国科会科资中心微片资料库) (连结至全国图书联合目录)　 (连结至政大图书馆馆藏目录) 　　　　电子全文: 电子全文下载 　　　　论文名称: 台湾与中国大陆篮球选手家长式领导、动机气候、团队凝聚力与团 队满意关系之研究 　　　　论文名称: The Investigation of Paternalistic Leadership, Motivational Climate, Group Cohesion and Satisfaction BetweenTaiwan and China Basketball Players 　　　　指导教授: 季力康 none 　　　　学位类别: 硕士 　　　　校院名称: 国立体育学院 　　　　系所名称: 教练研究所 　　　　　学年度: 91 　　　　　语文别: 中文 　　　　论文页数: 96 　　　　　关键字: 团队满意 paternalistic leadership 台湾与大陆 satisfaction 家长式领导 perceived motivation climate 知觉动机气候 group cohesion 团队凝聚力 [摘要] 　　　本研究的目的在於探讨台湾与大陆篮球选手在家长式领导、知觉动机气候、团队凝 聚力与团队满意等变项的预测及差异情形。受试者为台湾甲组及大陆甲A男子篮球选手共 227名（台湾93名及大陆134名），以家长式领导量表、知觉动机气候量表、团队情境量表 以及满足感量表作为测量工具。研究结果显示： 　　　在家长式领导对知觉动机气候的预测方面：1.台湾选手的才德领导、仁慈领导、威 权领导对工作取向气候有显着正向预测力；大陆选手的才德领导、仁慈领导对工作取向气 候有显着正向预测力，2.台湾与大陆选手的威权领导对自我取向气候有显着正向预测力； 在知觉动机气候对团队凝聚力的预测方面：1.台湾选手的工作取向气候对社会凝聚力有显 着正向预测力、自我取向气候有负向预测力，大陆选手的工作取向气候、自我取向气候对 社会凝聚力无显着预测力，2. 台湾选手的工作取向气候对工作凝聚力有显着正向预测力、 自我取向气候有显着负向预测力，大陆选手的工作取向气候对工作凝聚力有显着正向预测 力；在知觉动机气候对团队满意的预测方面：台湾与大陆选手的工作取向气候对团队满意 有显着正向预测力；在家长式领导对团队凝聚力的预测方面：1.台湾选手的才德领导对社 会凝聚力有显着正向预测力、威权领导有显着负向预测力，大陆选手的家长式领导对社会 凝聚力无显着预测力，2.台湾选手的才德领导对工作凝聚力有显着正向预测力、威权领导 有显着负向预测力，大陆选手的仁慈领导对工作凝聚力有显着正向预测力；在家长式领导 对团队满意的预测方面：台湾与大陆选手的才德领导对团队满意有显着正向预测力；在团 队凝聚力对团队满意的预测方面：台湾选手的工作凝聚力对团队满意有显着正向预测力， 大陆选手的社会凝聚力、工作凝聚力对团队满意无显着预测力。 　　　台湾与大陆篮球选手在家长式领导、知觉动机气候、团队凝聚力与团队满意上的差 异比较方面：在才德领导方面，大陆选手显着高於台湾选手；在仁慈领导、威权领导、知 觉工作气候、知觉自我气候、社会凝聚力、工作凝聚力与团队满意方面台湾与大陆选手并 无显着差异。 [摘要] 　　　 The purpose of this research was to confer the forecast and differences of the Paternalistic, Perceived Motivation Climate, Group Cohesion and Satisfaction on the basketball players between Taiwan and China.　There were 227 basketball players recruited to participate in this study (including 93 Taiwan players who participated in Taiwan Basketball Game and 134 CBA League players in China, the average age: 23.9　years old). The tools for survey included Paternalistic, Perceived Motivation Climate, Group Cohesion and Satisfaction.　The results were as follows: 　　　 As to the forecast of Perceived Motivation Climate occurred by Paternalistic: a. Taiwanese players’ Moral Leadership, Benevolence Leadership and Authoritarianism Leadership were predicted by task-involving. The forecast was obviously positive； Chinese players’ Moral Leadership and Benevolence Leadership were predicted by task-involving.　Obviously, it was also a positive forecast. b. Taiwanese and Chinese players’ Authoritarianism Leadership was predicted by ego-involving.　The forecast was obviously positive. The forecast of Group Satisfaction occurred by Perceived Motivation Climate: Taiwanese and Chinese players’ task-involving was predicted by Satisfaction. The forecast was obviously positive. The forecast of Group Satisfaction occurred by Paternalistic: Taiwanese and Chinese players’ Moral Leadership was predicted by Satisfaction.　The forecast was obviously positive. The forecast of Group Cohesion occurred by Perceived Motivation Climate: a. Taiwanese players’ task-involving were predicted by social- cohesion. The forecast was obviously positive,　but the forecast on their ego- involving was opposite；Chinese players’ task-involving and ego-involving were predicted by social-cohesion. There was no obvious forecast.　b. Taiwanese players’ task-involving was predicted by task-cohesion. The forecast was obviously positive, but the forecast on their ego-involving was opposite； Chinese players’ task-involving were predicted by task-cohesion. The forecast was obviously positive. The forecast of Group Satisfaction occurred by Group Cohesion: Taiwanese players’ task-cohesion was predicted by Satisfaction. The forecast was obviously positive; Chinese players’ social- cohesion and task-cohesion were predicted by Satisfaction. There was no obvious forecast. The forecast of Group Cohesion occurred by Paternalistic: a. Taiwanese players’ Moral Leadership was predicted by social-cohesion. The forecast was obviously positive, but the forecast on their Authoritarianism Leadership was opposite; Chinese players’ Paternalistic was predicted by social-cohesion. There was no obvious forecast. b. Taiwanese players’ Moral Leadership was predicted by task-cohesion. The forecast was obviously positive, but the forecast on their Authoritarianism Leadership was opposite; Chinese players’ Benevolence Leadership was predicted by task-cohesion. The forecast was obviously positive. 　　　 According to the statistics by the independent-samples t-test analysis, it can be discovered as follows: Chinese players’ Moral Leadership was obviously higher than Taiwanese players’.　But, there was no difference on the Benevolence Leadership, Authoritarianism Leadership, Task-Involving, Ego- Involving, Social-Cohesion, Task-Cohesion and Satisfaction existed between Taiwan and China. [论文目次] 　第壹章 绪论--------------------------------------------------------------1 　第一节研究背景--------------------------------------------------------1 　第二节研究目的--------------------------------------------------------6 　第三节名词解释--------------------------------------------------------6 　第贰章 文献探讨----------------------------------------------------------9 　第一节家长式领导理论与相关研究----------------------------------------9 　第二节知觉家长式领导与动机气候相关研究--------------------------------13 　第三节知觉动机气候与团队凝聚力、团队满意之相关研究--------------------15 　第四节团队凝聚力与团队满意之相关研究----------------------------------20 　第五节台湾与中国大陆篮球选手之异同------------------------------------21 　第六节研究假设--------------------------------------------------------23 　第参章 研究方法----------------------------------------------------------25 　第一节研究架构--------------------------------------------------------25 　第二节研究对象--------------------------------------------------------26 　第三节研究工具--------------------------------------------------------28 　第四节研究程序--------------------------------------------------------33 　第五节资料处理--------------------------------------------------------34 　第肆章 研究结果----------------------------------------------------------35 　第一节家长式领导对知觉动机气候、团队凝聚力、与团队满意的预测----------35 　第二节家长式领导、知觉动机气候、团队凝聚力、与团队满意之差异----------49 　第伍章 讨论--------------------------------------------------------------54 　第一节家长式领导对知觉动机气候、团队凝聚力、与团队满意的预测----------54 　第二节家长式领导、知觉动机气候、团队凝聚力、与团队满意之差异----------64 　第陆章 结论与建议--------------------------------------------------------67 　第一节结 论-----------------------------------------------------------67 　第二节建 议-----------------------------------------------------------71 　参考文献-----------------------------------------------------------------74 　台湾中文版量表-----------------------------------------------------------81 　附录一　家长式领导量表---------------------------------------------------82 　附录二　家长式领导量表（修正版）-----------------------------------------84 　附录三　团队情境量表-----------------------------------------------------85 　附录四　知觉运动动机气候量表---------------------------------------------86 　附录五　满意度量表-------------------------------------------------------88 　大陆简体版中文量表-------------------------------------------------------89 　附录一　家长式领导量表---------------------------------------------------90 　附录二　家长式领导量表（修正版）-----------------------------------------92 　附录三　团队情境量表-----------------------------------------------------93 　附录四　知觉动机气候量表-------------------------------------------------94 　附录五　满意度量表-------------------------------------------------------96 [参考文献] 　中文部分 　季力康 （民83）：运动目标取向量表的建构效度－验证性因素分析的应用。体育学报 ，18辑，299-310页。 　季力康 （民85）：如何增加球队凝聚力。中华棒球，51期，76－78页。 　王锡堂 （民91）：人际和谐、领导行为与效能之探讨。国立高雄医学大学行为科学研究 所硕士论文。 　东方介德 （民90）：台湾与大陆篮球选手目标取向、知觉动机气候、自决能力、运动动 机与满足感之比较研究。国立体育学院教练研究所硕士论文。 　李安民、张力维、姒刚彦（1999）中美大学生体育成就动机结构模型的比较研究。体育 科学，第19卷第5期。 　姒刚彦 （2000）体育运动心理学的本土化研究与跨文化研究。体育科学，第20卷第3期 。 　庄艳惠 （民86）：教练领导行为对团队凝聚力及内在动机的影响。国立体育学院体育研 究所硕士论文。 　陈其昌（82）：排球教练领导行为对团队凝聚力的影响暨验证运动情境领导理论之研究 。国立体育学院硕士论文。 　高三福 （2001）：团队文化与教练领导：质化与量化两种研究途径。国立台湾师范大学 体育研究所博士论文。 　马君萍 （民88）：女子排球运动员知觉教练领导行为知觉运动动机满意度和内在动机之 相关研究。国立体育学院教练研究所硕士论文。 　凌孝綦 （民90）：国防杂志。第16卷第11期，99-108页。 　黄英哲、季力康 （民83）:运动动机与自觉能力对赛前状态性焦虑和满足感的相关研究 。体育学报，18辑，321-332页。 　黄英哲 （民83）:运动动机、自觉能力、赛前状态性焦虑和满足感的相关研究。国立台 湾师范大学体育研究所硕士论文。 　杨纯碧 （民87）：教练领导行为对团队气氛与教练选手关系满意度之影响。国立体育学 院硕士论文。 　张伟德 （民90）：家长式与转型式领导风格在军事单位的比较研究。国立中山大学人力 资源管理研究所硕士论文。 　蒋忆德 （民86）：女子篮球选手目标取向知觉动机气候喜爱动机气候及自觉能力与内在 动机及满足感之相关研究。国立体育学院教练研究所硕士论文。 　樊景立、郑伯埙（2000）：家长式领导：一项文化观点的分析。本土心理学研究，13期 ，127-180页。 　卢素娥 （民86）：大专篮球选手的知觉动机气候与团队凝聚力之相关研究。国立体育学 院体育研究所硕士论文。 　郑伯埙（1995a）：不同家长权威价值与领导作风的关系：台湾民营企业的实证研究。国 科会研究报告。 　郑伯埙（1995b）：差序格局与华人组织文化。本土心理学研究，3期，142-219页。 　郑伯埙（1995c）：家长权威与领导行为的关系：一个台湾民营企业主持人的个案研究。 中央研究院民族学研究所期刊，79期，119-173页。 　郑伯埙、周丽芳、樊景立（2000）：家长式领导三元模式的建构与测量。第五届华人心 理与行为科际学术研讨会。 　郑敏雄、刘一民（民80）：教练领导行为与团队凝聚力之关系研究-以参加79学年度大专 男子排球国手选拔赛之球队为例。中华民国八十学年度体育学术研讨会，235-252页。 　卢俊宏（民87）：运动心理学。台北：师苑出版。 　英文部分 　Ames, C., ＆ Archer, J.（1988）. Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267. 　Bird, A. M. (1977). Development of a moder for predicting team performance. Resarch Quarterly,48,24-32. 　Bryman,A.（1992）. Charistma and leadership of organizations.London:Sage. 　Bryman,A.（1996）. Leadershipin organizations.In S.Clegg, C Hardy and W. Nord （Eds.）Handbook of organization studies. London:Sage.pp.276-292. 　Carron, A. V., ＆ Chelladurai,P.（1981）: The dynamics of group cohesion in sport. Journal of Sport Psychology,3, 123-139. 　Carron, A. V., Widneyer, W.N., ＆ Brawley, L.R.（1985）. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology,7,244-266. 　Carron, A. V.（1982）. Cohesiveness in sport group: interpretions and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology,4,123-138. 　Celladurai, P. (1993). Ledership. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphey,＆ L. K. ennant (Eds.) , Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp.647-671). New York ：Macmillan. 　Celladurai, P. (1994). Ledership. in sport. In J. M. Silva, ＆　R. S. Weinberg(Eds.),Psychology foundations of sport (p.329-339).Champaign, IL,: Human Kinetics Publishers. 　Duda, J.L. (1986). Perception of sport success and failure among Whit, Black, and Hispanic adolescents. Sport Science, 214-222. 　Duda, J.L.,＆Allison, M.（1990） Cross-cultural analysis in exercise and Sport Psychology :A void in the field, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 318-335. 　Farh,K.L.,＆ Cheng,B.S（2000）. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadship in Chinese.Oranizations. In J.T.Li.,Tsui,A.S.,＆ E. Weldon（Eds.）, Management and Oranizations in the Chinese context. London:Aacmillan. 　Hall, H. （1990）. A social-cognitive approach to goal setting: The mediating effect of achievement goals and perceived ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, IL. 　Horne, ＆ Carron. A. V.(1985). Compatibility in coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Sport Psy-chology,7,137-149. 　Lochbaum, M. R., ＆ Roberts, G. C. (1993). Goal orientations and perceptions of the sport experience. Jornal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,15, 160-171. 　Maehr,M.L.,＆ Nicholls,J.G（1980）. Cultural and Achievement motivation:A second look.In Warrens（Ed.）Studies of cross-cultural Psychology,221-267. 　Martens, R., ＆ Peterson, J.A. （1971）. Group chesiveness as a determinant of success and member satisfaction in team performance. International Review of Sport Sociology,6,;49-61. 　Mikalachki. A （1969）. Group cohesion reconsidered. London, Ontrio :School of administration. University of western Ontario. 　　 Nicholls, J.G.（1984）. Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346. 　Seifriz, J.J., Duda, J. L. ＆ Chi, L.（1992）. The relationship of perceived motivational climate to intrinsic motivational and beliefs about success in basketball. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 375-391. 　Treasure,D,C. ＆ Roberts,G.C.（1998）. Relationship between female adolescents’ achievement goal orientations, perceptions of the motivational climate, belief about success and sources of satisfaction in basketball. International Journal of Sport and　Psychology,293, 211-230. 　Walling,J.M. ＆ Hacker,C.(1982). Causal relation-Ship among cohesion, Stisfaction, and peformance in women’s inter collegiate field hockey teams. 　Walling, N. D., Duda, J. L. ＆ Chi, L.（1993）. The perceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire: Construct and predictive validity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,15,172-183. 　Westre, K.R., ＆ Weiss, M.R.（1991）. The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and group cohesion in high school football teams.The Sport Psychology,5,41-54. 　Westwood, R.I.（1997）. Harmony and patriarchy:The cultural basis for’’ paternalistic leadship’’among overseas Chinese.Oranization Studies,18,445- 480. 　Weastwood, R.I., ＆ Chan,A.(1982). Headship and leadership. In R.I. Weastwood (Ed.),Organizational Behavior: Asoutheast Asian perspective. Hong Kong:Longman Group. 　Westwood, R.I., ＆ Chan,A.（1992）. headship and leadership. In R. I. Westwood (Ed.), Organizational Behavior: A Southeast Asian perspective. Hong Kong: Longman Group. 　White, S.A.（1996）. Goal orientation and perceptions of the motivational climate initiated by parents.Pediatric exercise science 8（2）, 122-129. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.114.56.13 -- 不要轻言放弃 否则对不起自己 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.80.14.105