: 这场比赛真的很精采,Harkleroad第三盘一度*5-1领先,但还是犯了新秀的大赛心理素质欠 : 佳的毛病失误连连或是不太敢打,让Hantuchova又再度稳定性回来,连续丢掉5局之後换 : Hantuchova发球要拿下比赛时,没想到集中力突然又回来,连续几个球打的很低且深让韩娃 : 失误起来於是竟然破发回来6-6. 接下来一段时间缠斗之後最後Hantuchova在自己的发球局 : 失误还是过多输掉比赛... At 5:2 Hantuchova played well she hit 3 clean winners pass Harleroad, Hantuchova was the one who is dictating the play, it is either she make winner or missed the line completely. : Harkleroad的打法我觉得其实跟一般新秀没有差太多,都是底线攻击型,打的落点今天跟韩 : 娃比起来还是略差一点,不过跟一些俄国新秀比起来防守的功夫作的比较好一点,发球则偏 : 弱一点,这是她今天常常被Hantuchova攻的一点...而Hantuchova今天的表现其实没有那麽 : 差,但是关键时刻失误太多输了这场比赛.. : by zerkchu Harleroad is more of defensive player in the mode of Clijsters, she is not a shotmaker as Hantuchova is, when on song Hantuchova is simply beautiful to watch. By her own standard Hantuchova did play badly, she simply did not have any consistancy in her game to win the match but she was close. 101 errors in a 3 hours and 3 sets match is not acceptable by any standard, think this way 101 errors equals 2.65 points in every game to your opponent,so you always start at 0:30 on your service game and 30:0 on your opponets service game. So there is no question Hantuchova played a bad match. A bad match is not indicated by the closeness of the result but what a player did over the length of thematch. by jliang --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw) ◆ From: 61.64.102.194