在此將第一段波出，歡迎大家公開試譯： Over many years, economic co-operation or integration was a non-topic in East and Southeast Asia. It was even anathema. Most of the countries performed extraordinary well in a non-cooperative case, that is each economy was doing what was best for itself given the actions of others. Co-operative solutions envisaged in other parts of the world (Europe, Latin America, Africa), could easily be dismissed as stagnating, non-performing, protectionist and inefficient, and the essential difference between integration and co-operation remained obscure in many circles. 此段落大約佔A4的六分之一。 以下的段落包含較多專有名詞： Getting the meaning right, however, has become an important issue since regional grouping started to mushroom rapidly during the last decade. The Pacific Economic Cooperation(PECC), the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation(APEC), and finally the East Asian Economic Group(EAEG) bear witness to this "growth industry". Whatever the driving forces that can be identified, whether internal (deeper intra-area economic transactions, for example, and more demand for policy co-ordination) or external ones (the perceived threats of the U.S.-Canada-Mexico Free Trade Agreement [FTA], the European Community[EC]internal market, or the possible failure of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trades[GATT] negotiations), there has been little clarity about the type of "goods" or "services" that the grouping are expected to produce...... 這樣兩段大概是A4一半。 案主當時說明是急件。兩天之內翻完相關內容英文四面左右。 以上。 歡迎大家指教。 我唯一理虧一點就是我當時沒有親眼看到文件檔。 案主未說明清楚文件難易度，致使我開價無法準確。 -- FINALE --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.119.149.248 ※ 編輯: hemisphere 來自: 140.119.149.248 (04/24 18:18) ※ 編輯: hemisphere 來自: 140.119.149.248 (04/24 18:20)