在此将第一段波出，欢迎大家公开试译： Over many years, economic co-operation or integration was a non-topic in East and Southeast Asia. It was even anathema. Most of the countries performed extraordinary well in a non-cooperative case, that is each economy was doing what was best for itself given the actions of others. Co-operative solutions envisaged in other parts of the world (Europe, Latin America, Africa), could easily be dismissed as stagnating, non-performing, protectionist and inefficient, and the essential difference between integration and co-operation remained obscure in many circles. 此段落大约占A4的六分之一。 以下的段落包含较多专有名词： Getting the meaning right, however, has become an important issue since regional grouping started to mushroom rapidly during the last decade. The Pacific Economic Cooperation(PECC), the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation(APEC), and finally the East Asian Economic Group(EAEG) bear witness to this "growth industry". Whatever the driving forces that can be identified, whether internal (deeper intra-area economic transactions, for example, and more demand for policy co-ordination) or external ones (the perceived threats of the U.S.-Canada-Mexico Free Trade Agreement [FTA], the European Community[EC]internal market, or the possible failure of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trades[GATT] negotiations), there has been little clarity about the type of "goods" or "services" that the grouping are expected to produce...... 这样两段大概是A4一半。 案主当时说明是急件。两天之内翻完相关内容英文四面左右。 以上。 欢迎大家指教。 我唯一理亏一点就是我当时没有亲眼看到文件档。 案主未说明清楚文件难易度，致使我开价无法准确。 -- FINALE --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.119.149.248 ※ 编辑: hemisphere 来自: 140.119.149.248 (04/24 18:18) ※ 编辑: hemisphere 来自: 140.119.149.248 (04/24 18:20)