※ 引述《bahnhof (火车站)》之铭言： : Meanwhile, the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, a gay rights : organization, argues that neither side, grandparents and parents, : sufficiently protects children being reared in nontraditional families, : affirming the primary importance of "the quality and security of the : relationship between individual children and adults rather than blood : ties or lables." : -- :

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) : ◆ From: 91.32.98.73 : 推 egghead:aka not becausa children is raised by a family of 08/25 18:46 : 推 egghead:one man and one woman, nor just because they might 08/25 18:47 : 推 egghead:instead be raised ny grandparents that have blood 08/25 18:47 : 推 egghead:relationships, can really ensure the children can be 08/25 18:48 : 推 toofat:猜一下...小孩的父母或祖父母离婚 任一方独自扶养孩子 就是 08/25 18:49 : 推 egghead:raised well in "nontraditional familes=a mom and a dad 08/25 18:49 : 推 egghead:sorry, traditional family = one mom and one dad 08/25 18:52 : → toofat:non-traditional family 主旨应该是说 如果爸爸和爸爸的男 08/25 18:51 : 推 egghead: so pro gay right people argue that what is important 08/25 18:52 : → toofat:友如果能和小孩有高品质及稳健的关系(或是一对没血缘养父) 08/25 18:53 : 推 egghead:is not how many dads or moms or blood linked caregiver 08/25 18:53 : 推 egghead:there are but rather the "quality of relationships" 08/25 18:54 : 推 egghead:thatprovide "secureness", which they argue gay couples 08/25 18:55 : 推 egghead:do just as well as a couple of man and woman 08/25 18:55 : 推 toofat:则小孩也能如同传统家庭(有爸爸妈吗)般健全成长... 08/25 18:56 感谢版主及toofat大的解惑。 本段主要就是说，血缘关系的家庭，未必就比领养家庭好。可是子句那一句 "neither side, grandparents and parents, sufficiently protects children being reared in nontraditional families" 应该要把 nontraditional 改成 traditional 才会变成我们认知的这个意思吧？ 是作者的typo，还是我还误会什麽？再次感谢罗！ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 91.32.98.73